Confirmed users
503
edits
Calendar:Architecture: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
I'd like to thank everyone who worked on this model. There are some good ideas here, and regardless of whether this model is adopted or not, I think discussion of the proposals here will signifcantly benefit calendar development. | I'd like to thank everyone who worked on this model. There are some good ideas here, and regardless of whether this model is adopted or not, I think discussion of the proposals here will signifcantly benefit calendar development. | ||
=== meta comments from mvl === | |||
While discussing the architecture is always a good thing, I'm not sure if the time is right. We are jsut coming back to something useable from the previous big rewrite. Doing another backend rewrite will, again, take a lot of time. I really doubt if we should do this now. | |||
Also, I'm not sure if changing the observer pattern fixes the problems. Problems with exceptions etc can also be fixed with the current system. We need to clearly define what you can pass to modifyItem, and how exceptions work. That code area is currently new and not clearly defined. It just needs more work. | |||