Thunderbird:Fix some longstanding bugs: Difference between revisions

 
Line 58: Line 58:
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146676 Bug 146676]: for any header in Search Messages for News.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146676 Bug 146676]: for any header in Search Messages for News.


* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 Bug 238816]: for custom headers in MailView and Search Messages (POP and IMAP).
* <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 Bug 238816]</s>: for custom headers in MailView and Search Messages (POP and IMAP).


* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242550 Bug 242550]: for custom headers in Filters for IMAP.   
* <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242550 Bug 242550]</s>: for custom headers in Filters for IMAP.   


In addition:
In addition:
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 Bug 319831]: All non-custom text headers in Search Messages for IMAP only have "contains" and "doesn't contain".
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 Bug 319831]: All non-custom text headers in Search Messages for IMAP only have "contains" and "doesn't contain".


[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187768 Bug 187768]: Recipient fields (To, CC, "To or CC") don't have "is/isn't in my address book"
<s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187768 Bug 187768]</s>: Recipient fields (To, CC, "To or CC") don't have "is/isn't in my address book"
<br><span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB&nbsp;3.0</span>
<br><span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB&nbsp;3.0</span>


Line 78: Line 78:
<span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB&nbsp;2.0</span>
<span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB&nbsp;2.0</span>


[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202605 Bug 202605]: Expert users would benefit from presenting the junk filter a little more like regular filters. There are several bugs that address individual features for this, in particular:  
<s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202605 Bug 202605]</s>: Expert users would benefit from presenting the junk filter a little more like regular filters. There are several bugs that address individual features for this, in particular:  
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196036 bug 196036] requests that Junk Status be a filter criterion.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196036 bug 196036] requests that Junk Status be a filter criterion.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198100 bug 198100] requests an option to change the execution precedence of junk controls compared to regular filters.
* <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198100 bug 198100]</s> requests an option to change the execution precedence of junk controls compared to regular filters.
Both of the above depend on [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223591 bug 223591], which requests that message be analyzed for junk on arrival, rather than after execution of filters. (There is a patch pending for this bug, unlikely to get into TB 2.0.)
Both of the above depend on [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223591 bug 223591], which requests that message be analyzed for junk on arrival, rather than after execution of filters. (There is a patch pending for this bug, unlikely to get into TB 2.0.)


canmove, Confirmed users
1,343

edits