canmove, Confirmed users
1,343
edits
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146676 Bug 146676]: for any header in Search Messages for News. | * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146676 Bug 146676]: for any header in Search Messages for News. | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 Bug 238816]: for custom headers in MailView and Search Messages (POP and IMAP). | * <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 Bug 238816]</s>: for custom headers in MailView and Search Messages (POP and IMAP). | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242550 Bug 242550]: for custom headers in Filters for IMAP. | * <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242550 Bug 242550]</s>: for custom headers in Filters for IMAP. | ||
In addition: | In addition: | ||
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 Bug 319831]: All non-custom text headers in Search Messages for IMAP only have "contains" and "doesn't contain". | [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 Bug 319831]: All non-custom text headers in Search Messages for IMAP only have "contains" and "doesn't contain". | ||
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187768 Bug 187768]: Recipient fields (To, CC, "To or CC") don't have "is/isn't in my address book" | <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187768 Bug 187768]</s>: Recipient fields (To, CC, "To or CC") don't have "is/isn't in my address book" | ||
<br><span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB 3.0</span> | <br><span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB 3.0</span> | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB 2.0</span> | <span style="background-color:lime;">Fixed for TB 2.0</span> | ||
[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202605 Bug 202605]: Expert users would benefit from presenting the junk filter a little more like regular filters. There are several bugs that address individual features for this, in particular: | <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202605 Bug 202605]</s>: Expert users would benefit from presenting the junk filter a little more like regular filters. There are several bugs that address individual features for this, in particular: | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196036 bug 196036] requests that Junk Status be a filter criterion. | * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196036 bug 196036] requests that Junk Status be a filter criterion. | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198100 bug 198100] requests an option to change the execution precedence of junk controls compared to regular filters. | * <s>[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198100 bug 198100]</s> requests an option to change the execution precedence of junk controls compared to regular filters. | ||
Both of the above depend on [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223591 bug 223591], which requests that message be analyzed for junk on arrival, rather than after execution of filters. (There is a patch pending for this bug, unlikely to get into TB 2.0.) | Both of the above depend on [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223591 bug 223591], which requests that message be analyzed for junk on arrival, rather than after execution of filters. (There is a patch pending for this bug, unlikely to get into TB 2.0.) | ||