TraceMonkeySecurityReviewForm

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Overview

The goal of the TraceMonkey project is to add a just-in-time (JIT) compiler to SpiderMonkey to speedup execution of chrome and web content JavaScript.

Background links
  • feature-tracking bug links
  • specs or design docs

Security and Privacy

  • What security issues do you address in your project?
  • Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
  • Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.

Exported APIs

  • Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
  • Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so?
  • Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics.
  • Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
  • Does it change any existing interfaces?

Module interactions

  • What other modules are used (REQUIRES in the makefile, interfaces)

Data

  • What data is read or parsed by this feature
  • What is the output of this feature
  • What storage formats are used

Reliability

  • What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
  • Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?

configuration

  • Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
  • Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
  • What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
  • What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?

Relationships to other projects - are there related projects in the community?

  • If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
  • Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?