Calendar:QA Chat:2006-03-08:Log

From MozillaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
[11:37]	<ctalbert>	Let's get started
[11:38]	<ctalbert>	We had a really good test day on Tuesday.
[11:39]	<ctalbert>	We ran about 133 testcases, and most of those were run on 
linux and mac. Which is very good. We needed some coverage there.
[11:39]	<ctalbert>	3 New bugs were found as a result of the test day.
[11:39]	<ctalbert>	We had lots of new people show up, which was very promising.
[11:40]	<ctalbert>	The winner was: skuribay. Which is really cool, since he just 
started helping us out back in January. So, we'll put his name up in the channel 
[11:41]	<ctalbert>	Unfortunately, we don't have any Sunbird T-shirts to give out 
yet, but maybe soon, if Sipaq gets his way :-)
[11:41]	<ctalbert>	Any feedback from the test day?
[11:42]	<ctalbert>	Our wiki site is down, I don't know if you noticed, so the 
agenda for today is only in my head.
[11:42]	<lilmatt>	uh oh
[11:42]	<lilmatt>	:)
[11:42]	<ctalbert>	yeah
[11:43]	<ctalbert>	A word on schedules. I will be out next week.
[11:43]	<ctalbert>	Our next test day will be on Tuesday the 20th.
[11:43]	=-=	mschroeder|away is now known as mschroeder
[11:43]	<mschroeder>	i'm back :)
[11:43]	<ctalbert>	yay
[11:44]	<ssitter> is working for me
[11:44]	<ctalbert>	oh cool. It came back.
[11:44]	-->|	ulf|away ( has joined #calendar-qa
[11:44]	=-=	ulf|away is now known as ulf
[11:45]	<ctalbert>	Well, there's stiill no agenda up there since I couldn't get 
to it this morning.
[11:45]	<ctalbert>	So, as I was saying, I'll be out next week, and our next test 
day is the 20th.
[11:45]	<ctalbert>	I think we should still have it, and test some of the big features 
that are landing right now.
[11:45]	<ctalbert>	So, we need a couple of people to volunteer to set up the stuff 
for the test day.
[11:46]	<ctalbert>	Specifically we need:
[11:46]	<ctalbert>	1. iTIP test cases written (I'll try to do some of that and ask 
Damian as well)
[11:46]	<ctalbert>	2. Put together the test day wiki for the 20th
[11:47]	<ctalbert>	3. Submit blog post about Test Day (to lilmatt or sipaq - they 
can post it)
[11:47]	<ctalbert>	Volunteers for 2 and 3?
[11:47]	<mschroeder>	I could help with 2.
[11:47]	<ctalbert>	thanks!
[11:47]	<ulf>	sorry, but I'm also having the week of next week
[11:48]	<ctalbert>	that's ok.
[11:48]	<ctalbert>	oh and on #3: I always copy the blog post to the newsgroup as 
well. But, that's basically copy+paste (as I'm sure you've noticed)
[11:49]	<mschroeder>	I could also help with 3.
[11:49]	<ctalbert>	I think one thing that we will definitely want to test on the 
20th will be iTIP support. I think some of the printing stuff has already landed 
too, and I'm sure more features will land next week.
[11:49]	<ctalbert>	thanks, mschroeder
[11:50]	<ctalbert>	Okay, that's all I had about that. Unless anyone has anything 
else, let's dive into the bugs.
[11:51]	<lilmatt>	Regarding 3: Send to sipaq. I forgot my blog password
[11:51]	<ctalbert>	You should reset it :-p
[11:51]	<ctalbert>	All right. Here are the QA Discussion Bugs:
[11:52]	<ctalbert>	bug 353887 is first
[11:52]	<mschroeder>	First one: Bug 341576
[11:52]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, NEW, Calendar Internal Code has errors when calculating 
recurrences with all-day and non-allday items
[11:52]	<firebot>	mschroeder: Bug 
enh, --, ---,, UNCO, A better event alarm dialog
[11:52]	<mschroeder>	;)
[11:52]	<ctalbert>	eh?
[11:53]	<ctalbert>	Okay, bug 341576 is first
[11:53]	<mschroeder>	sorry
[11:53]	<ctalbert>	doesn't matter
[11:54]	<mschroeder>	I think we should confirm this RFE and set the target to 0.7. 
There are already some UI mockups attached.
[11:54]	<ctalbert>	I think this can be confirmed.
[11:54]	<ctalbert>	I agree with that too.
[11:55]	<mschroeder>	Done.
[11:56]	<ctalbert>	Ok, next on my odd list is bug 369263 (I've sorted by Status)
[11:56]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, UNCO, Error Code when opening local ICS file generated 
[11:58]	<mschroeder>	Should we file a follow-up bug for a "Timezone missing" error 
[11:58]	<ctalbert>	So, should we recast this as "make a better error message when there 
is an incorrectly defined timezone?
[11:58]	<ctalbert>	There is good discussion here, we could recast this bug for that. 
(Change summary, add a comment about it.)
[11:58]	<mschroeder>	agreed
[11:58]	<ctalbert>	and confirm
[11:59]	<ctalbert>	Next up is bug 372049
[11:59]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, UNCO, File userChrome.css can,t be found as indicated 
in the enclosed below
[12:00]	<ctalbert>	Sunbird 0.2 and calendar 0.8????
[12:00]	<ctalbert>	What is calendar 0.8?
[12:01]	<mschroeder>	Don't know.
[12:01]	<lilmatt>	old xpi
[12:01]	<ctalbert>	oh. I didn't realize it was 0.8
[12:02]	<lilmatt>	I think it got up to 0.9
[12:02]	<ctalbert>	I tend to agree with Stefan that this one ought to be WFM
[12:02]	<ctalbert>	lilmatt: wow. And based on sunbird 0.2 codebase the whole time? 
oeiCal* fun?
[12:02]	<mschroeder>	I vote for WONTFIX. userChrome.css is something for more 
advanced users. They can create this file themselves.
[12:03]	<lilmatt>	ya
[12:03]	<ctalbert>	+1
[12:03]	<lilmatt>	I agree. Tb doesn't have this
[12:05]	<firebot> set the Resolution field on bug 372049 
[12:05]	<ctalbert>	Next up is 373198
[12:05]	<ctalbert>	bug 373198
[12:05]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, UNCO, nsChromeProtocolHandler.cpp version >= 1.111 
is not compatible with Forte cc 6.2
[12:05]	<mschroeder>	We should move it to the correct component.
[12:06]	<ctalbert>	ulf: this one is about someone being unable to build on Solaris. 
Should we CC mickey on this? Or should we refer them to #build?
[12:07]	<ulf>	yes, please cc mickey
[12:07]	<lilmatt>	not #build, #developers
[12:07]	<ctalbert>	And probably reassign to the proper component as well. Ah, thanks 
[12:07]	<lilmatt>	#build is for people having trouble with our tinderboxes, etc.
[12:07]	<ssitter>	build is for build/release team topics
[12:07]	<ctalbert>	good to know.
[12:07]	<ssitter>	as lilmatt said ...
[12:07]	<ctalbert>	No wonder they never answered my questions :-)
[12:08]	<ctalbert>	Last on the list is: bug 353887
[12:08]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, NEW, Calendar Internal Code has errors when calculating
 recurrences with all-day and non-allday items
[12:08]	<ssitter>	ctalbert: you should have read the channel topic ;-)
[12:09]	<ctalbert>	heh, true
[12:09]	<ctalbert>	In my defense, It was a long time ago
[12:09]	<ctalbert>	lilmatt: My question on this one was "should it block for 0.5"?
[12:10]	<ctalbert>	But, given the scope of the changes we'd have to make, I don't
 know if we'd want it for 0.5, truly.
[12:10]	<ctalbert>	Anyone else have ideas on this one?
[12:11]	<mschroeder>	no
[12:13]	<ctalbert>	All right, we'll take the QA Discussion needed off of it then.
[12:14]	<firebot> changed the Product on bug 373198 from
 Calendar to Core.
[12:14]	<Sebo_laptop>	its more a developer discussion needed thing
[12:15]	<mschroeder>	ctalbert: Will you morph 369263?
[12:15]	<ctalbert>	Sebo, true.
[12:15]	<ctalbert>	yes
[12:15]	<ctalbert>	mschroeder: ^^
[12:15]	<ctalbert>	The first QA Wanted bug is bug 340488
[12:15]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, UNCO, birthday's listed double after upgrade to a 
new sunbird version
[12:16]	<ctalbert>	boy that one's been on there a while.
[12:16]	<ssitter>	isn't mvl already working on better error messages for import 
[12:17]	<ssitter>	yeah, bug 370079
[12:17]	<firebot>	ssitter: Bug 
nor, --, ---,, ASSI, Show more user-friendly error message when import
[12:19]	<ctalbert>	ssitter, sounds like I should dupe the bug against this one then.
[12:20]	<ctalbert>	yeah, they're doing file->open which calls the import code iirc
[12:20]	<ctalbert>	thanks ssitter
[12:20]	<firebot> set the Resolution field on bug 369263 
to DUPLICATE of bug 370079.
[12:20]	<firebot>	Bug nor, 
--, ---,, RESO DUPLICATE, Need better error message when timezone 
definition is incorrect in ICS file
[12:21]	<ctalbert>	On the QAWanted List: What about bug 295633, this one sounds 
like it is WFM
[12:21]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug
 cri, --, ---,, UNCO, "New Event" freezes Sunbird
[12:21]	<Sebo_laptop>	the reporter is not responding in the birthday bug...
[12:22]	[INFO]	2 matches for “Sebo”: [Sebo, Sebo_laptop]
[12:22]	<ctalbert>	Sebo_laptop: I think we ought to go ahead and mark that one 
as WFM as well. Other thoughts?
[12:22]	<mschroeder>	295633: It's a not officially supported platform.
[12:23]	<firebot> added attachment 257840 to bug 354951.
[12:23]	<firebot>	Bug nor, 
--, ---,, NEW, ICS import fails in ip_parseFromStream [in 
[12:23]	<mschroeder>	340488: agreed
[12:24]	<firebot> set the Resolution field on bug 340488 
[12:25]	<Sebo_laptop>	the PPC bug can be wontfixed, I think
[12:26]	<ctalbert>	I agree. The BUILDID on that is also Sunbird 0.2, so more 
reason to Wontfix
[12:27]	<firebot> set the Resolution field on bug 295633 
[12:28]	<ctalbert>	I'm just going down the critical ones since we're almost out 
of time...
[12:28]	<ctalbert>	bug 368927 is next
[12:28]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
cri, --, ---,, UNCO, sunbird loads, runs internally, and terminates 
w/o any visual evidence
[12:29]	<mschroeder>	No response from reporter so far.
[12:30]	<ctalbert>	We'll leave that one alone. I counted 5 antivirus/firewall 
programs in that process list. Yikes.
[12:30]	<ctalbert>	bug 287612
[12:30]	<firebot>	ctalbert: Bug 
cri, --, ---,, NEW, PUT without GET/merge when deleting events 
from remote calendars
[12:31]	<mschroeder>	bvdbos request blocking-0.5 and set the qawanted flag
[12:31]	<Sebo_laptop>	ctalbert: probably the firewalls are the reason that we 
didnt get any answer yet
[12:32]	<ctalbert>	Sebo_laptop: lol
[12:32]	<ctalbert>	mschroeder: yes I agree.
[12:32]	<ctalbert>	oh, bvdbos did ask for blocking
[12:33]	<ctalbert>	Well, we need to ping lilmatt about this one then. I think he 
just stepped out. I'll take it up with him later today
[12:33]	=-=	mschroeder is now known as mschroeder|away
[12:33]	<ctalbert>	I asked the reporter of our newest Open Exchange bug to try to
 reproduce those other two QAWanted OpenEx bugs.
[12:34]	<ctalbert>	So maybe we can finally get some movement on those.
[12:34]	<mschroeder|away>	ctalbert: good move
[12:34]	<ctalbert>	thx
[12:34]	<ctalbert>	Okay, I think we're out of time.
[12:34]	<ctalbert>	Best of luck next week.
[12:34]	<ctalbert>	Happy testing