Calendar:QA Chat:2006-05-24:Log
From MozillaWiki
mschroeder: Hi ctalbert [11:17am] ctalbert: Hi [11:25am] ctalbert: mschroeder: remember chiller's problem from the other day: check out this bug, I wonder if it is related: bug 381812 [11:25am] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381812 maj, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, FF fails to download extensions, giving an "Error Code -228" message [11:26am] mschroeder: ctalbert: I'll have a look. [11:26am] ctalbert: Hmm...on second thought maybe not related. [11:26am] ctalbert: see what you think. [11:29am] ssitter: ctalbert: it looks like the l10n tinderboxen did not picked up the changes for 0.5and the mac ones are burning [11:29am] ssitter: or is this still to come? [11:29am] ssitter: also the Lightning tinderboxen are still building 0.5pre not 0.5. on purpose? [11:30am] ctalbert: ssitter, since we couldn't tag everything that night, we were unable to change the tinderboxes [11:30am] ctalbert: So the tinderboxes should be untouched (by our work) [11:31am] ssitter: as far as I see the non-l10n sunbird tinderboxen are already switched to 0.5 [11:33am] ctalbert: Hmm....maybe something went wrong. I'll ask lilmatt [11:33am] mschroeder: ctalbert: I don't know... server and protocols aren't my domain It is very difficult for us to test this server communication code. [11:34am] ctalbert: yes, that's true. It's not mine either, unfortuantely. [11:34am] ctalbert: I'll mention it in the bug and see if he has that "access-range" feature turned on in apache. [11:34am] lilmatt: I got my /mofo back and tagged talkback last night [11:34am] lilmatt: then I set the sunbird non-l10n tinderboxes. [11:35am] lilmatt: so we _should_ have an RC [11:35am] ctalbert: oh [11:35am] ctalbert: But we haven't changed lightning yet? [11:35am] • ctalbert is the last to know. [11:36am] ctalbert: lilmatt: What about lightning? [11:36am] lilmatt: I didn't get that far before I started making dumb errors so I stopped. [11:36am] lilmatt: (due to lack of sleep) [11:37am] ssitter: the l10n tinderboxen are still repacking 0.5pre and the l10n mac tinderbox reports "make[2]: *** [repackage-zip] Error 1" [11:38am] lilmatt: ya we need to set those to build too. [11:38am] lilmatt: and lightning [11:38am] ssitter: this are the configs in MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH_l10n, right? [11:38am] ctalbert: lilmatt: Will you have time this evening? I have time and can help, if needed... [11:39am] lilmatt: yes [11:39am] ctalbert: lilmatt: yes to sssitter, ctalbert or both? [11:40am] ssitter: ctalbert: yes [11:40am] lilmatt: both [11:41am] ssitter: ok [11:41am] ctalbert: Cool. Thanks for your help lilmatt. This is a perfect beginning for the calendar QA Chat [11:42am] lilmatt: [11:42am] • ssitter needs to be more patient [11:42am] ctalbert: So, you just saw the status of the 0.5 release played out right before your very eyes. [11:42am] ctalbert: Is there anything else on the agenda.... (/me checks) [11:42am] mschroeder: I think everyone wants 0.5 out of the door. [11:43am] ctalbert: +1! [11:44am] ctalbert: I guess we can go throught the discussion bugs next. Note that once we have an RC on both sunbird and Lightning we'll throw another test day. [11:44am] ctalbert: QA Discussion bugs: http://tinyurl.com/yhwge4 [11:44am] mschroeder: We should especially verfiy at least all bugs on the blocking list. [11:45am] ctalbert: Good point, and probably more pertienent. [11:46am] ctalbert: These are the blockers that need verification: http://tinyurl.com/2oqx5f [11:46am] ctalbert: Hmm...that's actually all of them [11:47am] ctalbert: 18 of those need to be verified [11:47am] ctalbert: I'll add that to the TODO list. [11:48am] mschroeder: I think 28. [11:48am] ctalbert: doh...yeah 28 [11:49am] ctalbert: I still think that the best way to handle that is make a specific query for the ones that need verifying and put that on the TODO list, and I'll also add it to our channel topic [11:50am] ctalbert: Do we want to walk through those bugs now or walk through the QA Discussion list.... [11:51am] mschroeder: Let's do qa discussion. [11:52am] ctalbert: sorting by Severity, bug 357493 is first [11:52am] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357493 maj, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, Lightning unable to install if profile is stored on a fat32/vfat partition on Linux [11:53am] • ctalbert thought we decided something specific about this one last week... [11:54am] ctalbert: ah I was supposed to ask Daniel about it. [11:54am] mschroeder: [11:54am] ctalbert: Hard to catch him on IRC. I'll just post in the bug. [11:54am] mschroeder: okay [11:55am] ctalbert: bug 371946 is next [11:55am] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371946 maj, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, Cannot delete event on network calendar [11:56am] mschroeder: I think this is not possible with webcalendar. [11:58am] ctalbert: Hmm...so this is a bug in webcalendar? We should mark this as INVALID? [11:59am] ctalbert: mschroeder: ^^ is that correct? [12:00pm] mschroeder: ctalbert: It's no feature in webcalendar and webcalendar doesn't respond in any way on a delete attempt. [12:01pm] ctalbert: ok. I think I capture that in my comment. Feel free to edit... [12:01pm] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com set the Resolution field on bug 371946 to INVALID. [12:02pm] ctalbert: bug 362505 is next [12:02pm] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362505 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Mutiple Error Windows Without Content [12:03pm] ctalbert: This is such a common issue, I think we need a better error message, something like: "Dude, your ICS file is corrupted!" [12:04pm] ssitter: 0.5pre now displays a detailed error message [12:04pm] ctalbert: Because these error messages make it look as though Sunbird/Lightning is at fault and can't parse the ICS. [12:04pm] ctalbert: Ah, cool. You can tell I haven't done this in a while. [12:05pm] ssitter: "an unknown and undefined timezone was found while reading ..." [12:05pm] ctalbert: Then I'm going t dupe this bug against one of the other ones. [12:05pm] ctalbert: bug 375397 is next [12:05pm] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375397 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Wrong Redo keyboard shortcut in Edit menu [12:06pm] ctalbert: actually, I'm going to mark 362505 INVALID, like all the other ICS without timezone bugs. [12:07pm] mschroeder: sorry, was on the phone [12:07pm] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com set the Resolution field on bug 362505 to INVALID. [12:08pm] ctalbert: Ssitter, I think the issue with 375397 is that we can dupe it against 365810 [12:09pm] denis joined the chat room. [12:09pm] ctalbert: Do you agree with that ^ [12:11pm] ssitter: regarding webcalendar: http://www.k5n.us/webcalendar.php?topic=FAQ#faq_6 [12:11pm] ssitter: is this what the bug is about? [12:12pm] ctalbert: No, I was talking about bug 375397 and bug 365810, I think 375397 is a dupe of 365810 [12:12pm] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365810 tri, --, ---, mscott@mozilla.org, UNCO, Ctrl+Y for Edit->Redo broken [12:13pm] ctalbert: But that is what bug 371946 is about, I'll add that to its comments. Thanks for the link [12:13pm] ssitter: that was for bug 371946 [12:13pm] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371946 maj, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, RESO INVALID, Cannot delete event on network calendar [12:13pm] mschroeder: ssitter: I don't think so. It sounds like an internal thing... everything is kept in database but not displayed [12:13pm] ssitter: but what if you access the database using a fat client, e.g. Sunbird? [12:14pm] ctalbert: Right, something that doesn't know to filter on the proverbial "isdeleted" column [12:14pm] ctalbert: Depends on where webcalendar does their filtering. [12:14pm] ssitter: ctalbert: yes, I think 375397 and 365810 is the same toolkit bug [12:14pm] ctalbert: thanks [12:15pm] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com set the Resolution field on bug 375397 to DUPLICATE of bug 365810. [12:16pm] mschroeder: I will do more testing with the Webcalendar development version and look at the compatibility with our products. [12:16pm] ctalbert: mschroeder: That would be great. If you find anything that deserves a mention in the release notes let me know. I'll file a bug where you can leave a comment. [12:17pm] ctalbert: What do you guys think about bug 379124, it's next on the list [12:17pm] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379124 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, New mail window hangs after Lightning install [12:17pm] mschroeder: Have we a wiki page on compatibility with webdav, caldav and other calendar servers? [12:17pm] ctalbert: I used to use the nokia theme with 1.5.xx and eventually gave up on it as it caused too many problems. [12:18pm] ctalbert: mschroeder: I don't know, but that would be a good one to start [12:19pm] ssitter: resolve WFM per comment #4? [12:19pm] mschroeder: +1 [12:20pm] firebot: New Calendar - Website bug 381885 filed by ctalbert@mozilla.com. [12:20pm] firebot: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381885 nor, --, ---, ctalbert@mozilla.com, NEW, Need to write release notes for the 0.5 Calendar Release [12:20pm] ctalbert: sounds good to me [12:21pm] ssitter: ok, i'll do [12:21pm] ctalbert: mschroeder and everyone else: ^^ There is a bug add items that need to be covered by the release notes. Also gives me a place to attach the HTML patch. [12:21pm] ctalbert: Note that we don't want to add bugs to that, those should be tracked via the relnote keyword. Just general issues like this compatibility stuff. [12:22pm] firebot: ssitter@googlemail.com set the Resolution field on bug 379124 to WORKSFORME. [12:23pm] ssitter: some bugs use status whiteboard "[cal relnote]" instead of relnote keyword [12:24pm] ctalbert: ssitter, thanks. I'd forgotten about that one. [12:25pm] ctalbert: We've only got about 5 minutes left to this meeting, anyone have any issues/bugs they need to discuss? [12:25pm] ssitter: when will 0.5 be released? [12:25pm] ssitter: [12:25pm] ctalbert: lol [12:25pm] ctalbert: As my dad would say, "hold your horses!" [12:26pm] mschroeder: ctalbert: We started late... so more time is left. [12:26pm] ctalbert: ssitter, as soon as humanly possible [12:26pm] ctalbert: Well, if we want to keep going, the next bug is 379208 [12:27pm] ssitter: firebot: bug 379208 [12:27pm] firebot: ssitter: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379208 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, New event/new task window is too narrow [12:27pm] ctalbert: oops [12:27pm] ctalbert: ssitter, your understanding in comment 2 is correct. [12:28pm] ssitter: so it's wasted time to fix it [12:29pm] ssitter: but the prototype should be checked whether it exposes the same issue [12:29pm] ctalbert: True. It makes me sad though to mark this INVALID since it has a patch on it (even though its a small patch) [12:30pm] ctalbert: the prototype is more height constrained and less width constrained, so it might have the same issue in a different dimension [12:30pm] ctalbert: er...nevermind, this is for localizers [12:31pm] ssitter: it's a valid bug -> WONTFIX? [12:31pm] ctalbert: ssitter: Should we ask him to submit a patch for the new prototype dialog? [12:31pm] ctalbert: well..but it may not be needed. Yeah, WONTFIX sounds good [12:32pm] mschroeder: +1 [12:32pm] ssitter: or leave it open [12:32pm] ssitter: ask him to check the wcap lightning [12:32pm] ssitter: once his locale is available [12:33pm] ssitter: or better check the proto dialog using the wcap lightning for l10n issues [12:33pm] ctalbert: Let's leave it open until we can check WCAP L10N lightning [12:35pm] mschroeder: but we can mark the patch obsolete [12:35pm] ctalbert: yes, we could do taht [12:36pm] ctalbert: done [12:36pm] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com cancelled review?(lilmatt@flock.com) for attachment 263210 on bug 379208. [12:37pm] ctalbert: bug 379629 is next and is probably the last one I have time for. [12:37pm] firebot: ctalbert: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379629 nor, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, UNCO, mini calendar and date picker are completely redundant ui - should be able to choose one [12:38pm] ctalbert: I think we could also dupe this one against the new thunderbird integration work that Christian is doing [12:39pm] mschroeder: +1 [12:40pm] ctalbert: I think it's fine to dupe against 374080 which seems to be a "improve date picker situation" type of bug [12:41pm] mschroeder: also +1 [12:41pm] ctalbert: [12:41pm] firebot: ctalbert@mozilla.com set the Resolution field on bug 379629 to DUPLICATE of bug 374080. [12:41pm] firebot: Bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374080 enh, --, ---, nobody@mozilla.org, NEW, Replace datepicker in Lightning sidebar with datetextpicker [12:41pm] ssitter: mschroeder: 4! [12:42pm] mschroeder: ? [12:42pm] ssitter: +1 +1 +1 +1 = 4 [12:42pm] ssitter: ;-)
