Labs/Jetpack/SDK/0.10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|606597}} | | {{bug|606597}} | ||
| {{ | | {{miss|}} | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|569479}} | | {{bug|569479}} | ||
| | | {{risk|}} | ||
| finished feedback cycle w/ Irakli, new patch up, needs review Myk | | finished feedback cycle w/ Irakli, new patch up, needs review Myk | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
| P2 | | P2 | ||
| [[Labs/Jetpack/Reboot/JEP/114|JEP 114]] {{bug|545700}} | | [[Labs/Jetpack/Reboot/JEP/114|JEP 114]] {{bug|545700}} | ||
| {{ | | {{miss|}} | ||
| Lots of tests and docs done, but deprioritized in favor of e10s work -> miss. | | Lots of tests and docs done, but deprioritized in favor of e10s work -> miss. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|596053}} | | {{bug|596053}} | ||
| | | {{risk|}} | ||
| | | needs status update from Drew | ||
|- | |- | ||
| E10S-compatibility fixes for windows API | | E10S-compatibility fixes for windows API | ||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|606582}} | | {{bug|606582}} | ||
| {{ | | {{done|}} | ||
| | | turns out there were no incompatibilities to resolve | ||
|- | |- | ||
| make high-level modules use EventEmitter event model | | make high-level modules use EventEmitter event model | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
| {{bug|593737}} | | {{bug|593737}} | ||
| {{risk|}} | | {{risk|}} | ||
| | | Dietrich to look at patch; but it needs more cleanup and tests | ||
|- | |- | ||
| E10S-compatibility fixes for tabs API | | E10S-compatibility fixes for tabs API | ||
| | | Irakli | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|593908}} | | {{bug|593908}} | ||
| {{risk|}} | | {{risk|}} | ||
| | | EventEmitter patch ({{bug|598981}}) also takes care of this work | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rename product to Add-on SDK | | rename product to Add-on SDK | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|570876}} | | {{bug|570876}} | ||
| {{ | | {{done|}} | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| document content scripts | | document content scripts | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| {{bug|605627}} | | {{bug|605627}} | ||
| {{ | | {{risk|}} | ||
| | | one patch reviewed; some question about updating markdown files at the same time, which needs review of a larger patch | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 22:17, 9 November 2010
Goals
Be E10S-compatible. Be beta quality.
Timeline
| Milestone | Expected | Actual | Notes |
| Thaw | Monday, October 18 | Friday, October 22 | delays releasing 0.9 and the details of the switch to Git delayed this thaw |
| Freeze | Wednesday, November 10 (11am PT) | ||
| RC1 | Wednesday, November 10 | ||
| Final | Wednesday, November 17 |
Status: Planned: 2010-11-17
Major Deliverables
| Summary | Owner | Priority | References | Status | Notes |
| E10S integration framework | Atul | P1 | bug 567703 | [DONE] | |
| CommonJS-compatibility fixes | Brian | P1 | bug 606597 | [MISSED] | |
| E10S-compatibility fixes for Widget API | Dietrich | P1 | bug 569479 | [AT RISK] | finished feedback cycle w/ Irakli, new patch up, needs review Myk |
| Places API | Dietrich | P2 | JEP 114 bug 545700 | [MISSED] | Lots of tests and docs done, but deprioritized in favor of e10s work -> miss. |
| switch from add/remove to construct/destroy model | Drew | P1 | bug 596053 | [AT RISK] | needs status update from Drew |
| E10S-compatibility fixes for windows API | Felipe | P1 | bug 606582 | [DONE] | turns out there were no incompatibilities to resolve |
| make high-level modules use EventEmitter event model | Irakli | P1 | bug 593737 | [AT RISK] | Dietrich to look at patch; but it needs more cleanup and tests |
| E10S-compatibility fixes for tabs API | Irakli | P1 | bug 593908 | [AT RISK] | EventEmitter patch (bug 598981) also takes care of this work |
| rename product to Add-on SDK | Myk | P1 | bug 570876 | [DONE] | |
| document content scripts | Will | P1 | bug 605283 | [DONE] | |
| make Markdown syntax understand classes | Will | P1 | bug 605627 | [AT RISK] | one patch reviewed; some question about updating markdown files at the same time, which needs review of a larger patch |