Mozilla2:ImageLib: Difference between revisions
Cosmicdreams (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Patents on jpeg2k?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
JPEG2000: I have found an extension for mozilla and firefox that lets you view JPEG2000 pictures. I'll post it for those you haven't found it yet, as long as the site's maninter can handle the extra traffic and those folks here are ok with a little adverstisement on this site. It lead me to think that we should add the ability to view this file format in the standard dist, if it isn't much of a hassle. | JPEG2000: I have found an extension for mozilla and firefox that lets you view JPEG2000 pictures. I'll post it for those you haven't found it yet, as long as the site's maninter can handle the extra traffic and those folks here are ok with a little adverstisement on this site. It lead me to think that we should add the ability to view this file format in the standard dist, if it isn't much of a hassle. | ||
Isn't that illegal? JPEG2000 is heavily patented IIRC. Unless somebody's going to buy off the rights holders. And I didn't think mozilla.org had THAT sort of money. Anyway nobody uses JPEG2000, for this exact reason. | |||
Revision as of 03:37, 13 January 2005
We should try to add Apple's ColorSync support to the image decoders on Mac and Windows. Many who work with digital media come across images with embedded color profiles and so the images look incorrect in Mozilla. Safari displays them correctly.
JPEG2000: I have found an extension for mozilla and firefox that lets you view JPEG2000 pictures. I'll post it for those you haven't found it yet, as long as the site's maninter can handle the extra traffic and those folks here are ok with a little adverstisement on this site. It lead me to think that we should add the ability to view this file format in the standard dist, if it isn't much of a hassle.
Isn't that illegal? JPEG2000 is heavily patented IIRC. Unless somebody's going to buy off the rights holders. And I didn't think mozilla.org had THAT sort of money. Anyway nobody uses JPEG2000, for this exact reason.