Talk:SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Francesco312 (talk | contribs) |
Francesco312 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Smooth Wheel == | == Smooth Wheel == | ||
I've seen that Smooth Wheel is in the AMO group, but shouldn't it be marked as "Obsolete", now that you can set smooth scrolling via edit>preferences>appearance>content , just by checking the first box under the Favicon options? | * I've seen that Smooth Wheel is in the AMO group, but shouldn't it be marked as "Obsolete", now that you can set smooth scrolling via edit>preferences>appearance>content , just by checking the first box under the Favicon options? | ||
* Dictionary Switcher 0.9 [from xsidebar site] has max version 2.1.*. It still works with 2.2, despite being officially incompatible. | |||
--[[User:Francesco312|Francesco]] 09:09, 22 June 2011 (PDT) | --[[User:Francesco312|Francesco]] 09:09, 22 June 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 22 June 2011
No Tooltip Timeout
- Llev asked
- Hi, I'd like to know if No Tooltip Timeout works, or maybe if it's not needed anymore (FF bug 395668 is fixed, but what about SM?).
- InvisibleSmiley replied
- The FF bug you cited was fixed in Core/Layout for Mozilla 1.9.2. SeaMonkey is based on Mozilla 2.0 so it contains the fix for that bug, and the add-on is obsolete. :-)
The Future
- DERoss asks
- How will rapid releases of new SeaMonkey versions affect this list?
- How will pending changes to Add-ons Manager affect this list? (My understanding is that maxVersion values with wild-cards (e.g., 2.*) will no longer be accepted.)
Smooth Wheel
- I've seen that Smooth Wheel is in the AMO group, but shouldn't it be marked as "Obsolete", now that you can set smooth scrolling via edit>preferences>appearance>content , just by checking the first box under the Favicon options?
- Dictionary Switcher 0.9 [from xsidebar site] has max version 2.1.*. It still works with 2.2, despite being officially incompatible.
--Francesco 09:09, 22 June 2011 (PDT)