Talk:SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Francesco312 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== The Future == | == The Future == | ||
; DERoss asks | ; DERoss asks | ||
* How will rapid releases of new SeaMonkey versions affect this list? | * How will rapid releases of new SeaMonkey versions affect this list? See http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/06/22/172229/No-Additional-Firefox-4-Security-Updates regarding the impact on extensions from making Firefox 5 the security update of Firefox 4. | ||
* How will pending changes to Add-ons Manager affect this list? (My understanding is that maxVersion values with wild-cards (e.g., 2.*) will no longer be accepted.) | * How will pending changes to Add-ons Manager affect this list? (My understanding is that maxVersion values with wild-cards (e.g., 2.*) will no longer be accepted.) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 22 June 2011
No Tooltip Timeout
- Llev asked
- Hi, I'd like to know if No Tooltip Timeout works, or maybe if it's not needed anymore (FF bug 395668 is fixed, but what about SM?).
- InvisibleSmiley replied
- The FF bug you cited was fixed in Core/Layout for Mozilla 1.9.2. SeaMonkey is based on Mozilla 2.0 so it contains the fix for that bug, and the add-on is obsolete. :-)
The Future
- DERoss asks
- How will rapid releases of new SeaMonkey versions affect this list? See http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/06/22/172229/No-Additional-Firefox-4-Security-Updates regarding the impact on extensions from making Firefox 5 the security update of Firefox 4.
- How will pending changes to Add-ons Manager affect this list? (My understanding is that maxVersion values with wild-cards (e.g., 2.*) will no longer be accepted.)
Smooth Wheel
- I've seen that Smooth Wheel is in the AMO group, but shouldn't it be marked as "Obsolete", now that you can set smooth scrolling via edit>preferences>appearance>content , just by checking the first box under the Favicon options?
- Dictionary Switcher 0.9 [from xsidebar site] has max version 2.1.*. It still works with 2.2, despite being officially incompatible.
--Francesco 09:09, 22 June 2011 (PDT)