308
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
* Existing "void *aScopeObject" (ExecuteScript/EvaluateStringWithValue/CompileScript), replaced with nsIScriptGlobalObject. The language impl can then get its "void *" via either sgo->GetLanguageContext() or provide a default via its own private means. | * Existing "void *aScopeObject" (ExecuteScript/EvaluateStringWithValue/CompileScript), replaced with nsIScriptGlobalObject. The language impl can then get its "void *" via either sgo->GetLanguageContext() or provide a default via its own private means. | ||
This may require a helper function to return a (temporary?) nsIScriptGlobalObject for a given JSObject - eg, plugin code, nsXBLProtoImplField::InstallMember. | This may require a helper function to return a (temporary?) nsIScriptGlobalObject for a given JSObject - eg, plugin code, nsXBLProtoImplField::InstallMember. | ||
[actually, the above may be gratuitious and cause unnecessary problems] | [actually, the above may be gratuitious and cause unnecessary problems][Actually, XBL has an nsIScriptGlobalObject around when it's installing members; it'd just need to pass it around --[[User:Bzbarsky|Bzbarsky]] 18:55, 15 Aug 2005 (PDT)] | ||
* Need a "WrapNative" type function (or maybe not - this may end up being able to be hidden behind Get/SetProperty functions? | * Need a "WrapNative" type function (or maybe not - this may end up being able to be hidden behind Get/SetProperty functions? | ||
| Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
nsContentUtils::NotifyXPCIfExceptionPending(JSContext* aCx) - 2 callers: | nsContentUtils::NotifyXPCIfExceptionPending(JSContext* aCx) - 2 callers: | ||
* content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp - nsXBLProtoImplAnonymousMethod::Execute() - very JS specific | * content/xbl/src/nsXBLProtoImplMethod.cpp - nsXBLProtoImplAnonymousMethod::Execute() - very JS specific [Do we plan to keep XBL JS-specific, then? Or allow binding implementations done in other languages? I'd assume the "very JS specific" comment refers to the latter, right? If so, we'll need a lot of work on this front, especially to keep our existing brutal sharing; perhaps we need some nsIScriptContext methods for that sort of thing? I'd love for Execute() to not rely on jsapi.h --[[User:Bzbarsky|Bzbarsky]] 18:55, 15 Aug 2005 (PDT)] | ||
* dom/src/base/nsJSEnvironment.cpp | * dom/src/base/nsJSEnvironment.cpp | ||
edits