Add-ons/Reviewers/Content Review Guidelines: Difference between revisions

Add-ons/Reviewers/Content Review Guidelines (view source)

475 bytes removed , 30 January 2018

→‎Review Actions: removed section on determining whether a summary is adequate or not

1,698

edits

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ==Review Actions==
-. On the review page, use the box towards the end of the page to submit the review:
+. If the extension complies with the policy, click “Approve.” and then “Save” to submit the review. You can move on to the next extension.
-* If an extension looks unobjectionable (i.e., not spam) but you cannot reasonably infer what it does based on the title, summary, description, and screenshots in the listing, use the reviewer tool to request information:
-** Click Reviewer reply.
-** Mark the checkbox “Is more info requested?”
-** In the list next to “Insert canned response, select “Incomplete Description”
-** Click “Save” to submit the review.
 . If the extension does not adhere to the guidelines, click “Reject.”  Select all versions and enter the rejection message in the box.
-* Clearly describe which information in the listing violates our policy.
+* Use an appropriate canned response or clearly describe which information in the listing violates our policy.
 * Rejecting an extension will send a message to the developer and remove the extension’s listing on addons.mozilla.org (AMO).
 . If you see that an author’s name violates the Acceptable Use Policy, please escalate to an admin (see below).
-. If the extension complies with the policy, click “Approve.” and then “Save” to submit the review. You can move on to the next extension.
 ==Escalation==