WebDriver/RemoteProtocol/Meetings/2019/03/18: Difference between revisions

→‎Status update: correct some mistakes
(→‎Minutes: fill out)
(→‎Status update: correct some mistakes)
Line 17: Line 17:
=== Status update ===
=== Status update ===


* Landed couple fixes, flags, eslint, &c.
* Landed a couple of fixes for incorrect constants, lints, &c.
* Only major change was that we hooked the remote agent up to the build system
* Only major change was that we hooked the remote agent up to the build system
* Google meeting
* Google meeting
Line 23: Line 23:
** Next meeting on Monday 15 April
** Next meeting on Monday 15 April
* Progress in next two weeks is going to be limited, as both yulia and ato are away
* Progress in next two weeks is going to be limited, as both yulia and ato are away
* ''Question:'' What’s the blocker to get rid of the build flag? Security review?
* '''Q:''' What’s the blocker to get rid of the build flag? Security review?
** Security review is indeed a blocker, but we can prepare the patch
** Security review is indeed a blocker, but we can prepare the patch
** We need the remote agent to be part of the default builds to enable testing, although you might get around this with custom artifact builds
** We need the remote agent to be part of the default builds to enable testing, although you might get around this with custom artifact builds
** Long time since Alex did it, but should be possible
** Long time since Alex did it, but should be possible
** On the other hand, last time we did security review for Marionette it was very quick, so let’s see how soon we can get it done
** A hunch we’re initialising some things too early, Andreas might need to submit a patch
** A hunch we’re initialising some things too early, Andreas might need to submit a patch
*** Alex advises submitting review and then seeing what they say
*** Alex advises submitting review and then seeing what they say
* Alex didn’t expect the code to land as is, but can iterate on what is there
*** Let’s point out the problem with <code>RemoteAgent#constructor</code> in the security review
* Alex didn’t expect his patches from two weeks ago to land as they were, but can iterate on what is there now
** ato didn’t expect every patch to be perfect, but we should probably expect more tests in the future
** ato didn’t expect every patch to be perfect, but we should probably expect more tests in the future
** On the other hand it’s hard to reject changes if tests don’t run on try
** On the other hand it’s hard to reject changes if tests don’t run on try
715

edits