2
edits
Perceived Performance: Difference between revisions
→Other: , layout in Wikipedia pages.
(→Other: , innerHTML problem added.) |
(→Other: , layout in Wikipedia pages.) |
||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
* Friendlier looking error pages. Most people blame Firefox and not the site causing an issue when they see an error page. A little style and color psychology might help to ease the frustration that a user is feeling when they can't get to where they are trying to go. | * Friendlier looking error pages. Most people blame Firefox and not the site causing an issue when they see an error page. A little style and color psychology might help to ease the frustration that a user is feeling when they can't get to where they are trying to go. | ||
* Smarter text selection. It's difficult to select the text you want, because text selection follows invisible page layout elements rather than the locations of actual text. It takes fitts-law-aggravating pixel precision, and you can't even see what you're aiming for. | * Smarter text selection. It's difficult to select the text you want, because text selection follows invisible page layout elements rather than the locations of actual text. It takes fitts-law-aggravating pixel precision, and you can't even see what you're aiming for. | ||
* Performance of innerHTML is not so good, especially if many <span> elements are used. See also | * Performance of innerHTML is not so good, especially if many <span> elements are used. See also {{bug|500237}}. This bug is wanted, but not yet assigned. innerHTML is important for interactive sites, such as GMail. | ||
* It looks like if some layout calculations are slow. Go to the Wikipedia and visit pages with lot of floating pictures. For instance country sites, like USA, Russia and France. Google Chrome loads those pages about 33% faster then FF. Take also a look to the related {{bug|505328}}. Resizing this in Chrome is much faster then in FF. It is clear that FF has problems with calculating layout. | |||