SVG:Use: Difference between revisions

SVG:Use (view source)

140 bytes added , 6 September 2010

Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

969

edits

Revision as of 09:36, 6 September 2010 (view source) Jonathan Watt (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 09:39, 6 September 2010 (view source) Jonathan Watt (talk \| contribs) (→‎Alternatives)
Line 54:		Line 54:

	It would have been better if the spec had defined a 'clone' element, where 'clone' acts just like a 'g', but with anonymous content. If users wanted a viewport they could wrap the 'clone' in an 'svg' tag, instead of being forced to have one as 'use' forces you now.		It would have been better if the spec had defined a 'clone' element, where 'clone' acts just like a 'g', but with anonymous content. If users wanted a viewport they could wrap the 'clone' in an 'svg' tag, instead of being forced to have one as 'use' forces you now.

			Whereas 'clone' would create an anonymous (on non-anonymous?) content clone of the referenced content, we could also have a 'ref' element.