Scrum/Tools: Difference between revisions

Scrum/Tools (view source)

Revision as of 20:54, 3 June 2011

1 byte added , 3 June 2011

Alphabetical order.

John Karahalis

Confirmed users

1,193

edits

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 '''The Bad'''
+==The Mozilla Wiki==
+'''Address:''' https://wiki.mozilla.org/Main_Page
+'''The Good'''
+* Like Bugzilla, the Wiki is already very familiar to the Mozilla community.
+* The Wiki is extremely flexible, making it possible to provide most of the artifacts, backlogs, and statistics that Scrum encourages.
+'''The Bad'''
+* The Wiki's biggest strength may make it a liability for managing Scrum projects. Because it is so loose and unrestrictive, it cannot easily provide a list of "My Tasks", cannot easily track time remaining on tasks, cannot easily provide a burndown chart, etc.
@@ Line 74: / Line 85: @@
 * Trac does not provide a burndown chart by default. There is a [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/ScrumBurndownPlugin Burndown plugin], but like many Trac plugins, it is somewhat unstable and somewhat difficult to use.
 * Trac does not provide time estimation fields by default. There is [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TimingAndEstimationPlugin a plugin] for this, but it is again somewhat difficult to use.
-==The Mozilla Wiki==
-'''Address:''' https://wiki.mozilla.org/Main_Page
-'''The Good'''
-* Like Bugzilla, the Wiki is already very familiar to the Mozilla community.
-* The Wiki is extremely flexible, making it possible to provide most of the artifacts, backlogs, and statistics that Scrum encourages.
-'''The Bad'''
-* The Wiki's biggest strength may make it a liability for managing Scrum projects. Because it is so loose and unrestrictive, it cannot easily provide a list of "My Tasks", cannot easily track time remaining on tasks, cannot easily provide a burndown chart, etc.