Support/KB Doc Policies: Difference between revisions

 
Line 38: Line 38:
**'''Content changes that don't require immediate translation''' - the second level. Choosing this will notify localizers and the article will show up on dashboards and needing to be updated. This is what you'd use for most changes - updating an image, fixing {for} markup, adding or removing important (but not critical) sections.
**'''Content changes that don't require immediate translation''' - the second level. Choosing this will notify localizers and the article will show up on dashboards and needing to be updated. This is what you'd use for most changes - updating an image, fixing {for} markup, adding or removing important (but not critical) sections.
**'''Major content changes that will make older translations inaccurate''' - the third level. This will notify localizers and the article will show up on dashboards as being out of date. Also a yellow warning will be places at the top of the article telling users that the English version has the most accurate information. This would be used in cases where the old instructions are completely unusable.
**'''Major content changes that will make older translations inaccurate''' - the third level. This will notify localizers and the article will show up on dashboards as being out of date. Also a yellow warning will be places at the top of the article telling users that the English version has the most accurate information. This would be used in cases where the old instructions are completely unusable.
*'''Don't approve revisions just to give credit to someone''' - It's better to work with someone in the discussion forum to come up with a better revision. New contributors that are not participating in the discussion forum will be contacted by a SUMO admin in order to facilitate this process. '''Note:''' We need to fix the way credit works. Approved revisions based on unreviewed or rejected revisions should give everyone credit. This will eliminate the motivation for this issue.
*'''Don't approve revisions just to give credit to someone''' - It's better to work with someone in the discussion forum to come up with a better revision. New contributors that are not participating in the discussion forum will be contacted by a SUMO admin in order to facilitate this process. '''Note:''' We need to fix the way credit works ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628634 Bug 628634]). Approved revisions based on unreviewed or rejected revisions should give everyone credit. This will eliminate the motivation for this issue.


==Ready for Localization==
==Ready for Localization==
Confirmed users
3,193

edits