314
edits
FirefoxSummit/2006/ProposedSessions/CommunityTestingAndLitmus/Notes: Difference between revisions
FirefoxSummit/2006/ProposedSessions/CommunityTestingAndLitmus/Notes (view source)
Revision as of 23:54, 16 November 2006
, 16 November 2006no edit summary
Zachlipton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Zachlipton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Not seeing much overlap between testdays, only a few people come back. | * Not seeing much overlap between testdays, only a few people come back. | ||
* Of the top testers, several community members keeping pace with MoCo staff testers. | * Of the top testers, several community members keeping pace with MoCo staff testers. | ||
* Dip in number of testers Aug/Sep -- one was Thunderbird which historically has less interest, and we had a lot of testdays around the same time, community getting burned out? | * Dip in number of testers Aug/Sep -- one was Thunderbird which historically has less interest, and we had a lot of testdays around the same time, community getting burned out? | ||
* Seneca testday 2006-11-03 with 35 testers. Harness that kind of support in an ongoing basis? | |||
== Test days == | |||
* Seneca testday 2006-11-03 with 35 testers. Harness that kind of support in an ongoing basis? Seneca students assigned to come, most probably won't come back. | |||
* Trying to reward people with shirts and such, but we can't keep doing it to attract people | |||
* School/university support | |||
* Make testing calendar more widely known, publicize dates better. | |||
* Send automatic email to new Litmus testers after they've done some testing to introduce Mozilla QA + provide resources to get more involved. | |||
* More creative testdays--task oriented. | |||