Confirmed users
675
edits
Update:Remora Database Migration: Difference between revisions
Update:Remora Database Migration (view source)
Revision as of 20:01, 28 December 2006
, 28 December 2006→Duplicate Categories/Tags
| Line 541: | Line 541: | ||
===Duplicate Categories/Tags=== | ===Duplicate Categories/Tags=== | ||
* I haven't looked at the results since last week, but as I recall, there are many duplicate categories. My guess is that this is because in v1/v2, each application has to have its own category, so there might be an "Emo" category for Firefox and a different "Emo" category for Thunderbird, and the add-on is in both of them, but it only shows one because we grouped by name before. We will need to look at this and figure out whether to fix this in the code or migration. [[User:Fligtar|Fligtar]] 16:28, 27 December 2006 (PST) | * I haven't looked at the results since last week, but as I recall, there are many duplicate categories. My guess is that this is because in v1/v2, each application has to have its own category, so there might be an "Emo" category for Firefox and a different "Emo" category for Thunderbird, and the add-on is in both of them, but it only shows one because we grouped by name before. We will need to look at this and figure out whether to fix this in the code or migration. [[User:Fligtar|Fligtar]] 16:28, 27 December 2006 (PST) | ||
* (lars) the database schema for the `tags` table requires that we duplicate the entries because it has foreign keys to both the addontypes and applications tables. There are six tags called "Miscellaneous" because we need entries for the addontypes "extension" and "theme" for the applications "Firefox", "Mozilla" and "Thunderbird" | |||