Confirmed users
2,959
edits
B2G/QA/Test Plan Review: Difference between revisions
→External Workflow
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* UX Lead | * UX Lead | ||
* Product Lead | * Product Lead | ||
The feedback you should primarily go after with these parties is to look at the high-level definition of your test cases to validate that they sufficiently cover known development code, UX, and requirements flows. The details of the test cases and understandability is not important to expose to these parties, as that is already sufficiently covered by the internal QA review workflow and introduces overhead to these parties, which could potentially reduce the chance that the review will actually take place sufficiently. | The feedback you should primarily go after with these parties is to look at the high-level definition of your test cases to validate that they sufficiently cover known development code, UX, and requirements flows. The details of the test cases and understandability is not important to expose to these parties, as that is already sufficiently covered by the internal QA review workflow and introduces overhead to these parties, which could potentially reduce the chance that the review will actually take place sufficiently. | ||