Mobile/ProductPlanning/Notes-2013-08-13: Difference between revisions

Mobile/ProductPlanning/Notes-2013-08-13 (view source)

643 bytes added , 13 August 2013

canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

5,401

edits

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Notes ==
 === Flavours ===
+*Proposal to ship "feature" as incremental pieces vs. monolithic feature from engineering
+*However, UX/UR doing a workshop & deep dive into who are users are in this demographic and how best to serve them Sept. 9th
+*From there, we can brainstorm, role up our sleeves during the mobile work week
+*Plenty of progress is being made in unison... dria in the midst of competitive analysis. elan to assist with the ios side.
 === Fx for Readers ===
+*mfinkle has most of this in his brain
 === Pin image ===
+*Need to follow up with ibarlow, too but direction from eng side is to not include it by default.
 === Search info ===
@@ Line 18: / Line 24: @@
 * {{Bug|902719}} - Keep getting "package invalid" error on multiple update, reinstall attempts via Google Play.
 ** See http://cafbit.com/entry/android_package_file_is_invalid
-* Guest Browsing: are we all set with UX?
+* Guest Browsing: are we all set with UX? Nope, need to check in with ibarlow.
-* ekr has asked jsmith to do more testing before uplifting {{bug|888274}}
+* ekr has asked jsmith to do more testing before uplifting {{bug|888274}}. Action: need to set a go/no-go date for WebRTC
 * Giving it a week and then I'll get risk for: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Roadmap#Firefox_26:_TBD_.28Nightly.29