Firefox/Planning/2014-01-08: Difference between revisions

Line 53: Line 53:
====Current Releases====
====Current Releases====
;Two things we are looking into:
;Two things we are looking into:
*Rating Dip: We have been investigating a ratings dip that appears to have started around Dec 10th 2013. Currently, we think this could be related to three main issues:  
;Rating Dip: We have been investigating a ratings dip that appears to have started around Dec 10th 2013. Currently, we think this could be related to three main issues:  
# a [http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/12/30/multiple-developers-seeing-influx-of-unexplained-1-star-ratings-since-launch-of-play-stores-new-quick-rating-widget/ Google UX change] in the Play Store and  
# a [http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/12/30/multiple-developers-seeing-influx-of-unexplained-1-star-ratings-since-launch-of-play-stores-new-quick-rating-widget/ Google UX change] in the Play Store and  
# Slow performance on mid to low end devices.  
# Slow performance on mid to low end devices.  
# No Flash support on KitKat
# No Flash support on KitKat
The first  is not really in our control, but if we can feedback to Google, we probably should. #2 is within our control and we have been working on [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947390 improving pageload performance]. We need to make sure we include mid and low end devices when profiling/testing. Some of the data we have been gathering shows that regions, like Brazil, where we are growing, are the same regions where we are being rated poorly due to performance. Those regions also seem to be using mid to low end devices. The third we may have a solution for, glandium and snorp are investigating.
The first  is not really in our control, but if we can feedback to Google, we probably should. #2 is within our control and we have been working on [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947390 improving pageload performance]. We need to make sure we include mid and low end devices when profiling/testing. Some of the data we have been gathering shows that regions, like Brazil, where we are growing, are the same regions where we are being rated poorly due to performance. Those regions also seem to be using mid to low end devices. The third we may have a solution for, glandium and snorp are investigating.
*Crashes Trending up: .2, while 24 and 25 increased to around 1.5-1.6 and now with 26.0 shipped we're almost getting up to 2.0 again
;Crashes Trending up: .2, while 24 and 25 increased to around 1.5-1.6 and now with 26.0 shipped we're almost getting up to 2.0 again
# Top crash is SQLite Database related. The"fix" is based on patches in {{Bug|949639}} and {{Bug|949913}}. We are looking at these in Aurora right now and will uplift if possible
# Top crash is SQLite Database related. The"fix" is based on patches in {{Bug|949639}} and {{Bug|949913}}. We are looking at these in Aurora right now and will uplift if possible
#Approval received which should help prior to next release {{Bug|945327}}, {{Bug|930735}}, {{Bug|935831}}
#Approval received which should help prior to next release {{Bug|945327}}, {{Bug|930735}}, {{Bug|935831}}
canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
5,401

edits