Contribute/Coding/Triage: Difference between revisions
(First draft, incomplete.) |
(First draft concludes.) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
# We don't currently have a way to find or flag bugs as bugs as being in this intermediate "in-triage" state. | # We don't currently have a way to find or flag bugs as bugs as being in this intermediate "in-triage" state. | ||
Our proposed approach is | Our proposed approach is four: | ||
# Dramatically reduce triage and triage-followup friction. We're doing this in two ways: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1151745|minimizing the number of steps involved] and by polishing up Gijs' [https://github.com/gijsk/triage-helper|triage-helper addon] so we can make adding whiteboard flags (regression-range-needed, etc) and followup boilerplate (can you reproduce with a clean profile, here is a link to how to do that, etc) a matter of a few clicks. | # Dramatically reduce triage and triage-followup friction. We're doing this in two ways: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1151745|minimizing the number of steps involved] and by polishing up Gijs' [https://github.com/gijsk/triage-helper|triage-helper addon] so we can make adding whiteboard flags (regression-range-needed, etc) and followup boilerplate (can you reproduce with a clean profile, here is a link to how to do that, etc) a matter of a few clicks. | ||
# Make it much easier for community members to become a part of the triage process. This is happening in [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153108%20|bug 1153108] that lets users grant themselves canconfirm permissions, surfacing that contribution avenue in Bedrock, and improving our training documentation. | # Make it much easier for community members to become a part of the triage process. This is happening in [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153108%20|bug 1153108] that lets users grant themselves canconfirm permissions, surfacing that contribution avenue in Bedrock, and improving our training documentation. | ||
# Adding some keywords to Bugzilla and changing some processes so that bugs in-triage are not getting lost. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1154031|1154031] proposes to remove the "untriaged" components of Firefox::, Core:: and Toolkit:: and [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155386|1155386] proposes adding "in-triage" and "ready" status flags. | |||
Having these things in place, we can then take advantage of Graydon's [https://github.com/graydon/triage|triage helper] email tool that lets contributors sign up to triage X number of bugs over Y period of time. Graydon reports that this has been a very successful approach for the Rust community. To our back-of-the-envelope estimates - better numbers coming - the combination of an easier process, better tooling, better documentation and low-cost, low-touch involvement should let us get to a point where we can get our proverbial chins above the tide and keep them there. | |||
Revision as of 21:05, 16 April 2015
Improving the triage process.
Mike Hoye and Marcia Knous have a Q2/15 goal of triaging 100% of daily incoming bugs. In order to accomplish this, we need to have a crisp definition of what constitutes a non-triaged bug, and what "triage" is.
One naive and narrowly-scoped approach would be to set a goal of getting all the bugs from the (Firefox/Core/Toolkit)::Untriaged components and file them in the correct component. Perhaps unsurprisingly this would be both easy to achieve and not particularly helpful.
A better way to see triage is as a process rather than a binary state: to get a bug from "an unconfirmed bug from an new contributor" to "an engineer can make an informed decision about how to proceed". To get there, a bug may need:
- A clean-profile confirmation
- A testcase or STR
- A regression range
- Confirmation on a different OS
- Other assistance
There are obvious benefits to this approach for engineers and managers; the challenge is that:
- Working to this definition we're looking at one to three hundred bugs per day.
- Triaging bugs to this standard is a tedious, unconsidered process in Bugzilla as it stands.
- We don't currently have a way to find or flag bugs as bugs as being in this intermediate "in-triage" state.
Our proposed approach is four:
- Dramatically reduce triage and triage-followup friction. We're doing this in two ways: the number of steps involved and by polishing up Gijs' addon so we can make adding whiteboard flags (regression-range-needed, etc) and followup boilerplate (can you reproduce with a clean profile, here is a link to how to do that, etc) a matter of a few clicks.
- Make it much easier for community members to become a part of the triage process. This is happening in 1153108 that lets users grant themselves canconfirm permissions, surfacing that contribution avenue in Bedrock, and improving our training documentation.
- Adding some keywords to Bugzilla and changing some processes so that bugs in-triage are not getting lost. [1] proposes to remove the "untriaged" components of Firefox::, Core:: and Toolkit:: and [2] proposes adding "in-triage" and "ready" status flags.
Having these things in place, we can then take advantage of Graydon's helper email tool that lets contributors sign up to triage X number of bugs over Y period of time. Graydon reports that this has been a very successful approach for the Rust community. To our back-of-the-envelope estimates - better numbers coming - the combination of an easier process, better tooling, better documentation and low-cost, low-touch involvement should let us get to a point where we can get our proverbial chins above the tide and keep them there.