Foundation:Planning:2009OpsPlan:yearinreview: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__  
__NOTOC__ '''this is an INCOMPLETE DRAFT - Dec 29 2009'''  
'''this is an INCOMPLETE DRAFT - Dec 29 2009'''  


--  
--  
Line 11: Line 10:
*'''Organization:'''Consolidate and strengthen the Foundation team, and develop a long term vision that clarifies the Foundation's role within Mozilla.
*'''Organization:'''Consolidate and strengthen the Foundation team, and develop a long term vision that clarifies the Foundation's role within Mozilla.


The following is a '''review of achievements and learning''' related to these goals. Notes for each goal and priority are written in italics. Feedback is much encouraged, especially from Mozilla community members. Please post comments in response to [this blog posting]
The following is a '''review of achievements and learning''' related to these goals. Notes for each goal and priority are written in italics.  


''Note: regular status reports related to these goals and priorities were posted on Mark Surman's wiki throughout 2009. See: [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/whats-up-w-mofo-january-update/ January] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/february-update/ February] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/whats-up-w-mofo-march-update/ March] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/whats-up-w-mofo-may-update/ May] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/whats-up-w-mozfdn-july-update/ July] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/whats-up-w-mozfdn-september-update/ September] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/november2009updat/ November]''  
'''Feedback is very much encouraged''', especially from Mozilla community members. Please post comments in response to [add link to blog posting]
 
''See also: 2009 status reports tied to these goals: [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/01/19/whats-up-w-mofo-january-update/ January] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/february-update/ February] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/whats-up-w-mofo-march-update/ March] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/whats-up-w-mofo-may-update/ May] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/07/17/whats-up-w-mozfdn-july-update/ July] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/whats-up-w-mozfdn-september-update/ September] | [http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/november2009updat/ November]''  


=== 1. Communications  ===
=== 1. Communications  ===
Line 28: Line 29:
a. '''Redesign www.mozilla.org''' to better communicate Mozilla's mission and provide an entry point into the Mozilla community.  
a. '''Redesign www.mozilla.org''' to better communicate Mozilla's mission and provide an entry point into the Mozilla community.  


*''Completed in xx, 2009. Positive response has put mozilla.org back on radar as community resource. Also, good foundation for future work in areas like fundraising.''  
*''Completed in xx, 2009. New design plus perception that 'something is happening' have put mozilla.org back on radar as community resource. Also, good foundation for future work on fundraising.''  
*''Learning: Redesign alone was not enough to fully realize our 'better communicate Mozilla's mission' goal. Significant writing and elimination confusing overlaps w/ mozilla.com still needed.''  
*''Learning: Redesign alone was not enough to fully realize our 'better communicate Mozilla's mission' goal. Significant writing and elimination confusing overlaps w/ mozilla.com still needed.''  
*''2010 focus: compelling new content on Mozilla mission, overlaps with mozilla.com eliminated and key pages localized into at least five languages.''
*''2010 focus: compelling new content on Mozilla mission, overlaps with mozilla.com eliminated and key pages localized into at least five languages.''
Line 34: Line 35:
b. Update '''communications materials and web sites''' to better educate and excite the public about the Open Internet.  
b. Update '''communications materials and web sites''' to better educate and excite the public about the Open Internet.  


*''Defined a more unified approach to using Mozilla's brand across the community. Updated touchstone communication materials such as boilerplate blurb describing Mozilla.''
*''Defined a more unified approach to using Mozilla's brand across the community. Updated touchstone communication materials such as boilerplate blurb describing Mozilla.''  
*''Learning: 'fixing' the way we tell the Mozilla story is not possible -- or desirable. The diversity of the community means there will always be diverse expressions of this story. That said, we still need a key set of touchstones and assets to guide the story telling process.''
*''Learning: 'fixing' the way we tell the Mozilla story is not possible -- or desirable. The diversity of the community means there will always be diverse expressions of this story. That said, we still need a key set of touchstones and assets to guide the story telling process.''  
*''2010 focus: add stuff related to Chelsea's goals, also Mozilla style guide''
*''2010 focus: add stuff related to Chelsea's goals, also Mozilla style guide''


c. Explain and promote '''Mozilla's hybrid organizational model''', making the link between our mission and how we are organized.  
c. Explain and promote '''Mozilla's hybrid organizational model''', making the link between our mission and how we are organized.  


*''Achievements: Organized 'hybrid summit' in Mountain View plus wrote a ''[http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/04/23/what-is-a-hybrid-organization/ ''series''][http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/whyhybrid-orgsmatter/ ''of''][http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/hybridoldnew/ ''blog''][http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/hybridchalleges/ ''postings'']''on the topic.''
*''Achievements: Organized 'hybrid summit' in Mountain View plus wrote a ''[http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/04/23/what-is-a-hybrid-organization/ ''series''][http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/whyhybrid-orgsmatter/ ''of''][http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/hybridoldnew/ ''blog''][http://commonspace.wordpress.com/2009/05/20/hybridchalleges/ ''postings'']''on the topic.'' Establish Mozilla as a thought leader amongst other hybrid orgs.
*''Learning: while event was useful and well received, promoting the broader cause of hybrid orgs not critical to Mozilla's open web mandate.''
*''Learning: while event was useful and well received, promoting the broader cause of hybrid orgs not critical to Mozilla's open web mandate.''  
*''2010 focus: Nothing formal. Mark (and Mitchell?) may do some lightweight writing and speaking on the topic.''
*''2010 focus: Nothing formal. Mark (and Mitchell?) may do some lightweight writing and speaking on the topic.''


d. Develop a '''fundraising and engagement program''' with an aim to getting more people involved in Mozilla.  
d. Develop a '''fundraising and engagement program''' with an aim to getting more people involved in Mozilla.  


*''Hired fundraising and engagement manager mid-summer. Small campaign experiments in fall with One Web Day and Mozilla Service Week. Mozilla Parks campaign plus extensive planning and infrastructure development in November and December.''
*''Hired fundraising and engagement manager mid-summer. Small campaign experiments in fall with One Web Day and Mozilla Service Week. Mozilla Parks campaign plus extensive planning and infrastructure development in November and December.''  
*''Learning: first campaign experiments went poorly, especially from fundraising perspective. Need strong plan, infrastructure and calls to action if we want to succeed.''
*''Learning: first campaign experiments went poorly, especially from fundraising perspective. Also, getting web infrastructure in place is harder and slower than expected. Need strong plan, infrastructure and calls to action in order to succeed with future campaigns.''  
*''2010 focus: roll out plan that systematically goes after 'low hanging fruit' general Mozilla fundraising while simultaneously building up new calls to action around Drumbeat projects.''
*''2010 focus: roll out plan that systematically goes after 'low hanging fruit' general Mozilla fundraising while simultaneously building up new calls to action around Drumbeat projects.''


Line 58: Line 59:
a. Work with others across Mozilla to pilot '''Mozilla Service Week''' as a method of creating new ways for people to be involved in Mozilla.  
a. Work with others across Mozilla to pilot '''Mozilla Service Week''' as a method of creating new ways for people to be involved in Mozilla.  


*''Service Week produced mixed results. 10,000 hours were 'donated', but only after significant organizing effort. Some community members were confused by the initiative.''
*''Service Week produced mixed results. 10,000 hours were 'donated', but only after significant organizing effort. Some community members were confused by the initiative.''  
*''Learning: asking people to use the web to help any and all social causes was probably the wrong call to action. Our 'cause' should be the open internet -> it's our mission and is more likely to galvanize participation.''
*''Learning: asking people to use the web to help any and all social causes was the wrong call to action. Our 'cause' should be the open internet -> it's our mission and is more likely to galvanize participation.''  
*''2010 focus: use Drumbeat and open web cause as ways to get new people involved in Mozilla.''
*''2010 focus: use Drumbeat to get new people involved in Mozilla. Focus on the open internet as our core 'cause'. ''


b. Make it easier for community members to organize '''small local events like MozCamps''' that allow more people to find out about and get involved in Mozilla.  
b. Make it easier for community members to organize '''small local events like MozCamps''' that allow more people to find out about and get involved in Mozilla.  


*''Ran a few small experiments, mostly in Europe. Some were dedicated Mozilla events (e.g. MozCamp Utrecht) while others were shared events with other groups (e.g. open source meetups in Munich).''
*''Ran a few small experiments, mostly in Europe. Some were dedicated Mozilla events (e.g. MozCamp Utrecht) while others were shared events with other groups (e.g. open source meetups in Munich).''  
*''Learning: getting Mozilla-specific events off the ground was hard, probably because we didn't have clear enough goals or content. In contrast, more organic events like the meetups were easier and more successful.''
*''Learning: getting Mozilla-specific events off the ground was hard, probably because we didn't have clear enough goals or content. In contrast, more organic events like the meetups were easier and more successful.''  
*''2010 focus: efforts to build a ground game through small events has moved to Drumbeat, with a significant focus on 'piggybacking' on existing events like BarCamps and Ignites.''
*''2010 focus: efforts to build a ground game through small events has moved to Drumbeat, with a significant focus on 'piggybacking' on existing events like BarCamps and Ignites.''


Line 78: Line 79:
e. Help '''strengthen the Bugzilla community''' by aiding in the development of a sustainability plan, promoting innovation and contributing to useful features.  
e. Help '''strengthen the Bugzilla community''' by aiding in the development of a sustainability plan, promoting innovation and contributing to useful features.  


*''Focused on two activities: developing a Bugzilla API as a way to promote innovation complete and working with Bugzilla community leads to develop a fundraising plan.''
*''Focused on two activities: developing a Bugzilla API as a way to promote innovation and working with Bugzilla community leads to develop a fundraising plan. Both are near completition.''  
*''Learning: Bugzilla API well received and is resulting in people coming up with new Bugzilla hacks. However, not clear how much MoFo should focus on core community technology infrastructure of this nature. Fundraising plan hard to agree on but is now 90% complete.''
*''Learning: Bugzilla API well received and is resulting in people coming up with new Bugzilla hacks. However, not clear how much MoFo should focus on core community technology infrastructure of this nature. Fundraising plan hard to agree on but is now 90% complete.''  
*''2010 focus: promote Bugzilla API use, and move on. Roll out fundraising plan. Assess whether it is working mid-year.''
*''2010 focus: promote Bugzilla API use, and move on. Roll out fundraising plan. Assess whether it is working mid-year.''


Line 89: Line 90:


a. Develop a '''Mozilla Education program''', including an effort to expand the impact of the Seneca / Mozilla course model.  
a. Develop a '''Mozilla Education program''', including an effort to expand the impact of the Seneca / Mozilla course model.  
*''Transformed Seneca course into generalized approach to 'teaching with Mozilla' at any college or university. Grew partnership with single institution (Seneca) into program that works with x universities and y students in z countries.''
*''Learning: the Seneca teaching method is an effective way to both promote Mozilla's software development approach and attract new contributors to the project. While modest in scope, this is incredibly valuable. It does not, however, lend itself to being MoFo's 'big new program' as it is intimately tied into Mozilla's core software and technology development efforts. See also: Frank Hecker's detailed assessment of Mozilla Education in 2009.''
*''2010 focus: mainstream the expanded Mozilla Education program as a way to bring in new contibutors to Mozilla. Operate either as part of Mozilla Core programs at the foundaiton or find way to support from MoCo. Also, leverage relationships and learning about working w/ universities in Drumbeat activities that focus on education.''
b. Refine Mozilla's '''accessibility strategy''' to focus on ubiquitous zero-cost accessibility for Firefox and Thunderbird, accessible innovation and design in Mozilla, integration of accessibility into standard web development tools.  
b. Refine Mozilla's '''accessibility strategy''' to focus on ubiquitous zero-cost accessibility for Firefox and Thunderbird, accessible innovation and design in Mozilla, integration of accessibility into standard web development tools.  
c. Pilot a small scale '''research program''' that builds networks of researchers who want to work on specific issues of broad interest to Mozilla and the Open Internet (e.g. security).
 
*''Developed and rolled out ''[https://wiki.mozilla.org/Accessibility/Strategy ''Mozilla-wide accessibility strategy'']''. Made progress on (x, y and z)''
*''Learning: discuss w/ Marco and Bolter''
*''2010 focus: discuss w/ Marco and Bolter''
 
c. Pilot a small scale '''research program''' that builds networks of researchers who want to work on specific issues of broad interest to Mozilla and the Open Internet (e.g. security).  
 
*''Scoping and visioning efforts started in early 2009, but put on hold as it was difficult to find right approach.''
*''Learning: Mozilla Research is a worthy idea, but likely requires a dedicated leader from the outset to build the vision and momentum. In order to have impact, would probably need to be its own program on the scale of Drumbeat or even larger.''
*''2010 focus: nothing planned.''


=== Organization  ===
=== Organization  ===
Line 99: Line 114:
*''x''  
*''x''  
*''y''  
*''y''  
*''z''
*''budget savings''


<br> Specific priorities:  
<br> Specific priorities:  


a. Develop a long term '''vision and roadmap''' that clarifies the role of the Foundation within Mozilla.  
a. Develop a long term '''vision and roadmap''' that clarifies the role of the Foundation within Mozilla.  
*''Primary Mozilla Foundation roles now clear: carry Mozilla flag as leading public benefit organization promoting an open internet; provide a governance and support structure for existing community efforts; find new ways for everyday internet users to productively participate as part of the Mozilla community. Plan in place for major new MoFo effort in coming years (Drumbeat).''
*''Learning: while the primary place we can create impact is bringing the Mozilla story and community to more people, there is also a need to continue to play a role as steward and support system for Mozilla's traditional community. Balancing these two roles is hard, but essential. Finding out how to best strike this balance is one of our big challanges for 2010.''
*''2010 focus: from a vision and planning perspective, the focus will be -&gt; explain, execute and refine. Also, will participate in Mozilla-wide 2012 goals process.''
b. Build '''nimble, effective Mozilla Foundation team''', by clarifying roles and engaging in team building throughout 2009.  
b. Build '''nimble, effective Mozilla Foundation team''', by clarifying roles and engaging in team building throughout 2009.  
*''Demonstrably more effective and focused team by end of 2009, with 50% new people. Poised to double size of team in 2010 in order to roll out Drumbeat.''
*''Learning: Mozilla Core roles remain hardest to define and carry out, in part because the boundaries of this work are fuzzy and overlap with other parts of Mozilla.''
*''2010 focus: finalize Mozilla Core roles and expand team for Drumbeat.''
c. Improve Mozilla's '''grant making process''' through better guidelines, coordination and information sharing.  
c. Improve Mozilla's '''grant making process''' through better guidelines, coordination and information sharing.  
d. Consolidate and improve '''organizational systems''', especially related to grant tracking, fundraising, and internal communications.
 
*''Established coordinated grant review and documentation system to support all Mozilla organizations. Added section of mozilla.org that publicly documents all grants that Mozilla has given.''
*''Learning: shared documentation function incredibly valuable. For the first time, the public can get an overview of the work Mozilla is doing through grants. Need more time before we can assess the coordinated grant review process.''
*''2010 focus: refine and assess the process established in 2009?''
 
d. Consolidate and improve '''organizational systems''', especially related to grant tracking, fundraising, and internal communications.  
 
*''Developed new fundraising database and grant tracking method (as above).''
*''Learning: fundraising database has been harder to implement than we thought, in part because we're still learning how to work well with Mozilla IT team. Need to improve this in 2010.''
*''2010 focus: final roll out of fundraising database is top priority for Q1 2010. Developing better approach to working with Mozilla IT also a priority. May hire webmaster / tech coordinator to improve this situation.''

Revision as of 11:40, 30 December 2009

this is an INCOMPLETE DRAFT - Dec 29 2009 

--

In early 2009, we developed a set of operational goals and priorities to guide the work of the Mozilla Foundation team. The top level goals included:

  • Communications: Develop clearer messages and better systems to explain Mozilla's open web mission to a broad public.
  • Community: Work with other Mozilla organizations to strengthen and grow the Mozilla community, especially in key geographies.
  • Programs: Develop a small handful of programs that go beyond software as a way to promote Mozilla's mission (e.g. education).
  • Organization:Consolidate and strengthen the Foundation team, and develop a long term vision that clarifies the Foundation's role within Mozilla.

The following is a review of achievements and learning related to these goals. Notes for each goal and priority are written in italics.

Feedback is very much encouraged, especially from Mozilla community members. Please post comments in response to [add link to blog posting]

See also: 2009 status reports tied to these goals: January | February | March | May | July | September | November

1. Communications

Goal: Develop clearer messages and better systems to explain Mozilla's open web mission to a broad public.

  • add summary bullets related to overall goal
  • x
  • y
  • z

Specific priorities:

a. Redesign www.mozilla.org to better communicate Mozilla's mission and provide an entry point into the Mozilla community.

  • Completed in xx, 2009. New design plus perception that 'something is happening' have put mozilla.org back on radar as community resource. Also, good foundation for future work on fundraising.
  • Learning: Redesign alone was not enough to fully realize our 'better communicate Mozilla's mission' goal. Significant writing and elimination confusing overlaps w/ mozilla.com still needed.
  • 2010 focus: compelling new content on Mozilla mission, overlaps with mozilla.com eliminated and key pages localized into at least five languages.

b. Update communications materials and web sites to better educate and excite the public about the Open Internet.

  • Defined a more unified approach to using Mozilla's brand across the community. Updated touchstone communication materials such as boilerplate blurb describing Mozilla.
  • Learning: 'fixing' the way we tell the Mozilla story is not possible -- or desirable. The diversity of the community means there will always be diverse expressions of this story. That said, we still need a key set of touchstones and assets to guide the story telling process.
  • 2010 focus: add stuff related to Chelsea's goals, also Mozilla style guide

c. Explain and promote Mozilla's hybrid organizational model, making the link between our mission and how we are organized.

  • Achievements: Organized 'hybrid summit' in Mountain View plus wrote a seriesofblogpostingson the topic. Establish Mozilla as a thought leader amongst other hybrid orgs.
  • Learning: while event was useful and well received, promoting the broader cause of hybrid orgs not critical to Mozilla's open web mandate.
  • 2010 focus: Nothing formal. Mark (and Mitchell?) may do some lightweight writing and speaking on the topic.

d. Develop a fundraising and engagement program with an aim to getting more people involved in Mozilla.

  • Hired fundraising and engagement manager mid-summer. Small campaign experiments in fall with One Web Day and Mozilla Service Week. Mozilla Parks campaign plus extensive planning and infrastructure development in November and December.
  • Learning: first campaign experiments went poorly, especially from fundraising perspective. Also, getting web infrastructure in place is harder and slower than expected. Need strong plan, infrastructure and calls to action in order to succeed with future campaigns.
  • 2010 focus: roll out plan that systematically goes after 'low hanging fruit' general Mozilla fundraising while simultaneously building up new calls to action around Drumbeat projects.

Community

Goal:Work with the Mozilla Corporation and Mozilla Messaging to strengthen and grow the Mozilla community, especially in key geographies.

Specific priorities:

a. Work with others across Mozilla to pilot Mozilla Service Week as a method of creating new ways for people to be involved in Mozilla.

  • Service Week produced mixed results. 10,000 hours were 'donated', but only after significant organizing effort. Some community members were confused by the initiative.
  • Learning: asking people to use the web to help any and all social causes was the wrong call to action. Our 'cause' should be the open internet -> it's our mission and is more likely to galvanize participation.
  • 2010 focus: use Drumbeat to get new people involved in Mozilla. Focus on the open internet as our core 'cause'.

b. Make it easier for community members to organize small local events like MozCamps that allow more people to find out about and get involved in Mozilla.

  • Ran a few small experiments, mostly in Europe. Some were dedicated Mozilla events (e.g. MozCamp Utrecht) while others were shared events with other groups (e.g. open source meetups in Munich).
  • Learning: getting Mozilla-specific events off the ground was hard, probably because we didn't have clear enough goals or content. In contrast, more organic events like the meetups were easier and more successful.
  • 2010 focus: efforts to build a ground game through small events has moved to Drumbeat, with a significant focus on 'piggybacking' on existing events like BarCamps and Ignites.

c. Grow and connect the community of organizations involved in the Powered by Mozilla program.

  • Dropped this as a priority mid-year. No plans to pick up for 2010.

d. Collaborate with others to develop a set of Mozilla community metrics, and find a way to regularly sample and draw insights from metrics data.

  • Dropped this priority mid-year. May pick up some aspects in relation to mozilla.org work in 2010, but not a major focus on its own.

e. Help strengthen the Bugzilla community by aiding in the development of a sustainability plan, promoting innovation and contributing to useful features.

  • Focused on two activities: developing a Bugzilla API as a way to promote innovation and working with Bugzilla community leads to develop a fundraising plan. Both are near completition.
  • Learning: Bugzilla API well received and is resulting in people coming up with new Bugzilla hacks. However, not clear how much MoFo should focus on core community technology infrastructure of this nature. Fundraising plan hard to agree on but is now 90% complete.
  • 2010 focus: promote Bugzilla API use, and move on. Roll out fundraising plan. Assess whether it is working mid-year.

Programs

Goal:Develop a small handful of programs that go beyond software as a way to promote Mozilla's mission (e.g. education).

Specific priorities:

a. Develop a Mozilla Education program, including an effort to expand the impact of the Seneca / Mozilla course model.

  • Transformed Seneca course into generalized approach to 'teaching with Mozilla' at any college or university. Grew partnership with single institution (Seneca) into program that works with x universities and y students in z countries.
  • Learning: the Seneca teaching method is an effective way to both promote Mozilla's software development approach and attract new contributors to the project. While modest in scope, this is incredibly valuable. It does not, however, lend itself to being MoFo's 'big new program' as it is intimately tied into Mozilla's core software and technology development efforts. See also: Frank Hecker's detailed assessment of Mozilla Education in 2009.
  • 2010 focus: mainstream the expanded Mozilla Education program as a way to bring in new contibutors to Mozilla. Operate either as part of Mozilla Core programs at the foundaiton or find way to support from MoCo. Also, leverage relationships and learning about working w/ universities in Drumbeat activities that focus on education.

b. Refine Mozilla's accessibility strategy to focus on ubiquitous zero-cost accessibility for Firefox and Thunderbird, accessible innovation and design in Mozilla, integration of accessibility into standard web development tools.

c. Pilot a small scale research program that builds networks of researchers who want to work on specific issues of broad interest to Mozilla and the Open Internet (e.g. security).

  • Scoping and visioning efforts started in early 2009, but put on hold as it was difficult to find right approach.
  • Learning: Mozilla Research is a worthy idea, but likely requires a dedicated leader from the outset to build the vision and momentum. In order to have impact, would probably need to be its own program on the scale of Drumbeat or even larger.
  • 2010 focus: nothing planned.

Organization

Goal:Consolidate and strengthen the Foundation team and develop a long-term vision that clarifies the Foundation's role within Mozilla.

  • add summary bullets related to overall goal
  • x
  • y
  • budget savings


Specific priorities:

a. Develop a long term vision and roadmap that clarifies the role of the Foundation within Mozilla.

  • Primary Mozilla Foundation roles now clear: carry Mozilla flag as leading public benefit organization promoting an open internet; provide a governance and support structure for existing community efforts; find new ways for everyday internet users to productively participate as part of the Mozilla community. Plan in place for major new MoFo effort in coming years (Drumbeat).
  • Learning: while the primary place we can create impact is bringing the Mozilla story and community to more people, there is also a need to continue to play a role as steward and support system for Mozilla's traditional community. Balancing these two roles is hard, but essential. Finding out how to best strike this balance is one of our big challanges for 2010.
  • 2010 focus: from a vision and planning perspective, the focus will be -> explain, execute and refine. Also, will participate in Mozilla-wide 2012 goals process.

b. Build nimble, effective Mozilla Foundation team, by clarifying roles and engaging in team building throughout 2009.

  • Demonstrably more effective and focused team by end of 2009, with 50% new people. Poised to double size of team in 2010 in order to roll out Drumbeat.
  • Learning: Mozilla Core roles remain hardest to define and carry out, in part because the boundaries of this work are fuzzy and overlap with other parts of Mozilla.
  • 2010 focus: finalize Mozilla Core roles and expand team for Drumbeat.

c. Improve Mozilla's grant making process through better guidelines, coordination and information sharing.

  • Established coordinated grant review and documentation system to support all Mozilla organizations. Added section of mozilla.org that publicly documents all grants that Mozilla has given.
  • Learning: shared documentation function incredibly valuable. For the first time, the public can get an overview of the work Mozilla is doing through grants. Need more time before we can assess the coordinated grant review process.
  • 2010 focus: refine and assess the process established in 2009?

d. Consolidate and improve organizational systems, especially related to grant tracking, fundraising, and internal communications.

  • Developed new fundraising database and grant tracking method (as above).
  • Learning: fundraising database has been harder to implement than we thought, in part because we're still learning how to work well with Mozilla IT team. Need to improve this in 2010.
  • 2010 focus: final roll out of fundraising database is top priority for Q1 2010. Developing better approach to working with Mozilla IT also a priority. May hire webmaster / tech coordinator to improve this situation.