Reps/Application Process/Selection Criteria: Difference between revisions
< Reps | Application Process
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Vineelreddyp (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
</li><li> will the applicant be able to pull together his own resources at times even though if Mozilla is unable to provide? example: designing presentations, press releases, make own swag? | </li><li> will the applicant be able to pull together his own resources at times even though if Mozilla is unable to provide? example: designing presentations, press releases, make own swag? | ||
</li><li> what would be his commitment period to the program? (3 months, 6months etc) | </li><li> what would be his commitment period to the program? (3 months, 6months etc) | ||
</li></ul> | </li> | ||
<li>Open to work in collaboration</li></ul> | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 24 March 2011
Selection criteria for ReMo applicants
The following are suggested criteria that ReMo council members should consider when making a decision on whether or not to select a ReMo applicant:
- how long has the applicant been involved in the Mozilla project
- how knowledgeable is the applicant of the Mozilla Project, our mission and our values
- what are the applicant's main motivations to join ReMo
- do you feel this person would explain Mozilla well to a public audience?
- do you feel this person is genuinely interested in helping promote Mozilla ?
- is the applicant already involved in other community-driven projects?
- is the applicant familiar with the different products Mozilla develops and different Mozilla initiatives (eg. Drumbeat, Firefox Live etc..)
- nomination/recommendation from team leader, eg OpenMatt for drumbeat, maryc for marketing
- will the applicant be able to pull together his own resources at times even though if Mozilla is unable to provide? example: designing presentations, press releases, make own swag?
- what would be his commitment period to the program? (3 months, 6months etc)
- Open to work in collaboration