Websites/Processes/Retrospectives/Release: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
We’ll try to contain retrospectives to one hour. Here’s an outline to help facilitate the meeting. Open communication is the goal. Finger pointing isn’t. When scheduling a retrospective, copy the below agenda into the meeting invite or send via email. | We’ll try to contain retrospectives to one hour. Here’s an outline to help facilitate the meeting. Open communication is the goal. Finger pointing isn’t. When scheduling a retrospective, copy the below agenda into the meeting invite or send via email. | ||
Title: | |||
<nowiki> | <nowiki> | ||
Retrospective Agenda for Mozilla Project XXX | Retrospective Agenda for Mozilla Project XXX | ||
</nowiki> | </nowiki> | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 15 April 2011
DRAFT: Release Retrospective Agenda Template
We should be doing post-mortems (ahem, I mean retrospectives) for all Mozilla projects. The purpose is to learn from our mistakes and improve our processes, as well as acknowledge and celebrate our successes.
We’ll try to contain retrospectives to one hour. Here’s an outline to help facilitate the meeting. Open communication is the goal. Finger pointing isn’t. When scheduling a retrospective, copy the below agenda into the meeting invite or send via email.
Title:
Retrospective Agenda for Mozilla Project XXX
Body:
To get a comprehensive review of all aspects of the project lifecycle, topics are broken down by phase and/or stakeholder. For each item below we will discuss “what went well” and “what can be improved” as well as the specific questions pertaining to each item. Intro * (Re)introduce the team * Provide general overview and recap of the project. Planning * Was there clear requirements and a solid understanding of the app from the start? * Were goals and success metrics clearly defined? Design * Did creative provide sufficient user stories? Resources * were roles/responsibilities clear? * Were there sufficient resources to execute all phases smoothly within the project scope and schedule? Schedule * Was the schedule realistic? * Did anything cause the schedule to slip? QA testing * Did the development team adhere to QA’s checklist? IT/Deployment * Were there any issues getting the app onto stage? * How did launch go? Communication * Were the channels of communication between all the stakeholders established from the start? * Was there anything that blocked or hindered communication? Summary Action items