Confirmed users
2,492
edits
Firefox/Beta/2011-05-09: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Created page with "==Agenda== * Beta user stats * Stability report") |
No edit summary |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
* Schedule | |||
* Beta user stats | * Beta user stats | ||
* Stability report | * Stability report | ||
* Go/no-go decision | |||
* Repo/mechanics | |||
==Schedule== | |||
* Official "Go To" Beta is still May 17th. | |||
* The code that's in Aurora on the 16th, will move to Beta and we will do a build from there. | |||
* The merge happens and we have the choice at that time whether or not the update is put out for all the beta users or not. | |||
* We have 6 bugs we are tracking and we will either get them resolved or decide they are not severe enough to block. | |||
* Laura: When will people see this beta live? Probably a couple of days after we do the merge. We will want some time to test this. | |||
* Christian will work with Laura offline to figure out time line - bugs will be logged for all the web pieces and everything that needs to happen when. | |||
* Christian will also publish a detailed schedule of the merge timeline so that rel eng and marketing can plan accordingly. | |||
==Beta user stats== | |||
* According to crash stats, yesterday's volume on 5.0b1 was 37K. | |||
* Over the weekend, getting about 11K hits on the first run page per day. | |||
* Last Thurs/Fri, about 15K hits per day. | |||
* John: We have been running with 50% throttling so we didn't overshoot. Should we up that? | |||
** We are going to go to change to 100% unthrottled for that group of people. | |||
** We will not stop at 100K users either; will offer to all ~417K eligible users. | |||
** Details in {{bug|651982}} | |||
* Bump in numbers is en-US only - this is because FF5.0b1 is en-US only, not localized. | |||
==Stability report== | |||
* Top crash list similar to top crash list for Aurora. | |||
* No new or explosive crashes have been identified. | |||
* Still need more users on the channel to get better stability data. | |||
* A couple of issues with the crash metrics have surfaced | |||
** We are currently throttling 5.0 crash reports at 10%. We want to change this so that on Beta, we have 100% and throttle on release. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655838 Bug 655838] will be fixed today. | |||
** There is a second issue where the crash rate appears to be miscalculated. For 37K ADUs on 5.0 we have 1600 crashes which seems high if you compare to a similar number of users on the trunk. This is still under investigation. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655846 Bug 655846] | |||
==Go/no-go decision== | |||
* There was a thread on the list about this. | |||
* What data would QA present to help us make the Go/no-go decisions? | |||
** What has QA done up to that point. | |||
** Stability report. | |||
** Performance? We don't have anybody reporting on this. Most of these should be handled in the Nightly to Aurora transition. | |||
** Bugs we are tracking that need to be resolved before going to Beta - 6 bugs. | |||
* Next Monday we will assemble this information to make a go/no-go decision for doing the merge. | |||
* Matt owns packaging this up for Monday's meeting. | |||
* Extension compatibility | |||
** Do we care about this? We probably can't make it part of the calculation for this time but in the future, this will be a bigger part of the criteria. | |||
** Would we delay going to Beta if an extension is not compatible? Probably something we need to take to the list. | |||
* There are 2 explicit decisions here | |||
** Do a beta? | |||
** Did we do it correctly? | |||
==Repo/Mechanics== | |||
* All ready for 17may. | |||
** Still an issue with l10n but it does not affect the merge on May 17th. This *might* relate to the next merge from Aurora-Beta. | |||