8
edits
SeaMonkey:Reasons: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→End Users: My reasons for wanting to keep seamonkey alive) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SeaMonkey-Resources}} | {{SeaMonkey-Resources}} | ||
| Line 70: | Line 69: | ||
Also as administrator I cannot argue against users why to install a combination of firefox and thunderbird until they dont show up with the features of the mozilla suite. I have to give my users something that is an improvement against the previous version (what ever its name is). But with firefox - how many plugins will I have to install until I get the features the users already have with mozilla suite? In case of making a choice, i would either stay on mozilla 1.8beta or have a turn to opera... | Also as administrator I cannot argue against users why to install a combination of firefox and thunderbird until they dont show up with the features of the mozilla suite. I have to give my users something that is an improvement against the previous version (what ever its name is). But with firefox - how many plugins will I have to install until I get the features the users already have with mozilla suite? In case of making a choice, i would either stay on mozilla 1.8beta or have a turn to opera... | ||
= Marketing and UI = | |||
==[[User:vd|Vitor Domingos]]== | |||
As marketing and UI engineer, i must say there are a couple of reasons that we'll like to see going on the Mozilla Suite: | |||
* All-in-one wonder (mozilla+addressbook+mail) | |||
* Perfectly integrated with all the plugins and extensions avaiable | |||
* [http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/emails/NickFagerlund.html Faster than FF] | |||
* Good UI, preferences in place | |||
* Good marketing value so far | |||
* It's my browser since i remember :) | |||
For the future, I'd like to see more integration with OpenOffice.org, maybe joining efforts in one "true and full" office suite. | |||