WebDev/DownloadDayPostMortem: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* Tracking everything via bugs.
* Tracking everything via bugs.
* Grouphub was good for external vendors & marketing
* Grouphub was good for external vendors & marketing
* Good that we had lots of languages.
* Affiliate buttons (43 million impressions). Localized too!
* Using SFX gave it more of a community feel.
* DD increased membership of SFX.
* Lots of press releases and social networking sites.
* Coordination of marketing team and volunteers.





Revision as of 21:28, 2 July 2008

Things we did well

  • Certs, affiliate buttons, languages, map, states. Good job on keeping everything under control. Very few big issues.
  • 2 states to the website, kept people engaged. Map was good.
  • Mailing went well. Only 3 remove me complaints. MailChimp was great.
  • Teams worked really well together. WebDev, QA & Marketing.
  • Tracking everything via bugs.
  • Grouphub was good for external vendors & marketing
  • Good that we had lots of languages.
  • Affiliate buttons (43 million impressions). Localized too!
  • Using SFX gave it more of a community feel.
  • DD increased membership of SFX.
  • Lots of press releases and social networking sites.
  • Coordination of marketing team and volunteers.


Things we did not well

  • Tracking work items via Grouphub
  • QA should be more active in initial design/requirements phase.