269
edits
State Of The Internet/Surveillance Economy/consentandidentity: Difference between revisions
State Of The Internet/Surveillance Economy/consentandidentity (view source)
Revision as of 18:34, 11 February 2020
, 11 February 2020→Powering-up Consent and Identity
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
* Collaborate with digital media companies and progressive brands to understand how we might foster an advertising system that's not based on invasive profiling, ad fraud, and brand degradation. How might we work with publishers on better consent management platforms/CMPs? And perhaps also with opt-in ad providers, like Good Loop? | * Collaborate with digital media companies and progressive brands to understand how we might foster an advertising system that's not based on invasive profiling, ad fraud, and brand degradation. How might we work with publishers on better consent management platforms/CMPs? And perhaps also with opt-in ad providers, like Good Loop? | ||
* Check out Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure’s work in the area of dynamic identities, which are very difficult in practice. | * Check out Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure’s work in the area of dynamic identities, which are very difficult in practice, not least of which because they require a lot of work by product users. | ||
* How might Mozilla's [https://github.com/mozilla/blushproof project around improving private browsing] relate? | * How might Mozilla's [https://github.com/mozilla/blushproof project around improving private browsing] relate? | ||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
:“Identity is a word which those with privilege identify with. How do you diversify and stretch framing so it appeals to low agency groups too?” | :“Identity is a word which those with privilege identify with. How do you diversify and stretch framing so it appeals to low agency groups too?” | ||
:"A lot of the potential partners identified here would centralize ID. Why would we want that?" | |||
:"Need to determine appropriate relationship to official government IDs (eID)" | |||
| Line 143: | Line 147: | ||
* Cities (e.g. Barcelona) | * Cities (e.g. Barcelona) | ||
* Creative Commons and EFF | * Creative Commons and EFF | ||
* Collective consent for privacy-respecting ads with Project Meridio? (Mozilla Fellow David Gehring) | |||
* [https://tosdr.org/ Terms of Service: Didn't Read project] | |||
| Line 148: | Line 154: | ||
* What might a community hub for consent look like? | * What might a community hub for consent look like? | ||
* How might we collectivize the withdrawal of consent for Mozilla’s users (per GDPR)? | |||
* How could we create open source terms and condition certificates? | * How could we create open source terms and condition certificates? | ||
* Identify areas of data management where control/management demonstrably matters to users (e.g. this isn't hard to explain) and where such user management would also prove valuable to some set of businesses. In this model, companies are free to refuse service if 'sufficient' data (their definition) isn't provided. It's imperative we begin understanding and shaping the business side value here. | |||
* How could we create “playlists” of consent to which people could subscribe, and what could we learn from this? | * How could we create “playlists” of consent to which people could subscribe, and what could we learn from this? | ||
* How might we tie this to class action lawsuits to increase 'risk' in the system, thus driving business interest in less data on a 'need-to-know' only basis? Could enable Firefox Monitor users to file suits. <br /> | |||
Other observations from All Hands include: <br /> | |||
:"This could save users attention!! Attention is Mozilla’s next ‘privacy’" | |||
:"How could we game out the possible consequences of this model so that we don't simply replicate current asymmetries and injustices?" | |||
:"What are a community's motivations and incentives around this?" | |||
:"Don’t overlook role of individuals consent manager, perhaps as a starting point" | |||
===Phase Three: Reaching Our Destination: Differential Data Agents=== | ===Phase Three: Reaching Our Destination: Differential Data Agents=== | ||
| Line 167: | Line 185: | ||
'''What problem does it solve?'''<br /> | '''What problem does it solve?'''<br /> | ||
For users, computational agents that support individuals’ needs through collective action could inject both convenience and trust. | For users, computational agents that support individuals’ needs through collective action could inject both convenience and trust. (Note that CCPA regulations somewhat recognized the likelihood of such 'authorized agents') | ||
For companies, allows them to use data from a large group of people without being exposed to the compliance risks of being responsible for that data. | For companies, allows them to use data from a large group of people without being exposed to the compliance risks of being responsible for that data. | ||
| Line 181: | Line 199: | ||
* Legal firms or insurance providers. | * Legal firms or insurance providers. | ||
* Startups in the digital consent space. | * Startups in the digital consent space. | ||
* Mozilla Fellow Richard Whitt's work with [http://www.glia.net Glia.net's] decentralized ecosystem of digital trust | * Mozilla Fellow Richard Whitt's work with [http://www.glia.net Glia.net's] decentralized ecosystem of digital trust and digital trusted intermediaries | ||
'''How could we start?'''<br /> | '''How could we start?'''<br /> | ||
Research agent-agent protocols, and explore possibilities for negotiation. | * Research agent-agent protocols, and explore possibilities for negotiation. | ||
* Build on MoFo’s work on data stewardship + data trusts <br /> | |||
Other observations from All Hands include: <br /> | |||
:"We have a potentially important point of leverage (education, movement building) with how we can illuminate the 'black box' of trackers and the companies behind them to Firefox browser users." | |||
:"SayMine is a ‘privacy’ vendor based in Israel that kind of does this, but only for Data Subject Access Rights managers. They have future plans to monetise. “Discover what the internet knows about you and control your digital footprint. You decide where your data should or shouldn't be, and we'll make it happen.” | |||
:"Look at Jumbo, a pre-existing app that maxes out your privacy settings for you across multiple services." | |||
:"There is no data privacy awareness in Asia. Why would they use this?" | |||