19
edits
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
It was six years ago, on 24 December 1999, that the last version of HTML, HTML4.01, became a W3C Recommendation. Since then, W3C shifted its focus to XHTML, but despite the single focus and drive received by XHTML, it has to be admitted that XHTML has failed miserably to make any visible inroad into the mainstream | It was six years ago, on 24 December 1999, that the last version of HTML, HTML4.01, became a W3C Recommendation. Since then, W3C shifted its focus to XHTML, but despite the single focus and drive received by XHTML, it has to be admitted that XHTML has failed miserably to make any visible inroad into the mainstream �especially compared to the rate of adoption of other specs before it. | ||
The good old HTML remains the ''lingua franca'' of the web, motivating others outside W3C, namely the WHATWG, to consider an extended spec, dubbed HTML5, that would include some features (such as webforms, canvas, or math markup) to address the most pressing needs missing in HTML. Against this backdrop, Tim BL recently recognized that XHTML did not catch on, and revived the HTML WG at W3C. So here we are again, considering once more what to add to HTML, and the hope this time is that math markup won't miss out, whether considering HTML5 @ | The good old HTML remains the ''lingua franca'' of the web, motivating others outside W3C, namely the WHATWG, to consider an extended spec, dubbed HTML5, that would include some features (such as webforms, canvas, or math markup) to address the most pressing needs missing in HTML. Against this backdrop, Tim BL recently recognized that XHTML did not catch on, and revived the HTML WG at W3C. So here we are again, considering once more what to add to HTML, and the hope this time is that math markup won't miss out, whether considering HTML5 @ WHATWG, or HTML5 @ W3C. | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == |
edits