CrashKill/Topcrash: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (→Top crash identification criteria: clarify topcrash for Thunderbird Beta....) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* Thunderbird: | * Thunderbird: | ||
** Top 25 for Release | ** Top 25 for Release | ||
** Top 3 for Beta | ** Top 3 for Beta, Earlybird, Daily | ||
*** Focus only on worst of the worse | *** Focus only on worst of the worse, and explosive crashes, and regressions because Aurora Beta and Daily rankings don't correlate well** to final releases. So assigning topcrash status normally doesn't help significantly reduce release topcrashes. (** Probably because the respective user populations and environments are significantly different.) | ||
* Everything: | * Everything: | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 18 November 2013
The list of topcrash bugs is being kept up to date manually by the stability group by adding or removing the topcrash keyword on open (non-resolved) bugs according to the criteria below and the Top Crashers lists from Mozilla Crash Stats.
Top crash identification criteria
- Firefox:
- Top 20 desktop browser crashes on the latest release (once it is over 10M ADI).
- The 20-30 mark is where the numbers start to drop below 2000 crashes per week.
- Also, in the past, many of the crashes in the 20-50 ranges have been repeats of other signatures in the top 50. It's not an exact science here but we think it's important to pick some bar.
- Anything appearing in the 20-30 range that is marked as a start-up crash is also tagged as a top crash.
- Top 20 desktop browser crashes on Betas
- This should be pretty much the same as release. Where we see discrepancies are really around 3rd party issues which are important to call out for blocking candidates.
- Top 10 desktop browser crashes on Aurora and Nightly, if they happen for enough different installations.
- This might need some experience and feeling for what issues are important.
- Top 10 plugin crashes on Beta and Release
- Hang signatures are pretty generic and non-actionable right now (improvements are being worked on), the crashes in that list need to be looked at more carefully.
- Top 5 desktop browser crashes on Linux-, Mac-, and Win8- specific list on Beta and Release
- If there's less than 5 crashes per week on a signature, that bug probably still doesn't qualify - same for crashes happening to only 2 or 3 installations.
- If volume is very similar to the top 5, other bugs might still be included.
- Top 20 desktop browser crashes on the latest release (once it is over 10M ADI).
- MetroFirefox:
- TBD
- Firefox for Android:
- Top 10 ARMv7-crashes for Nightly, Aurora, Beta and Release
- Top 5 ARMv6- and x86- crashes for Beta and Release
- Until we see plugins and addons that highly effect the stability of Firefox for Android, it may make sense to just stay at 10 for all channels.
- B2G:
- Top 5 crashes inside of what we have symbols for and support. For FxOS 1.0 & 1.1, they can be found in https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/query/query?product=B2G&version=B2G:18.0&do_query=1
- If there's less than 5 crashes per week on a signature, that bug probably still doesn't qualify - same for crashes happening to only 2 or 3 installations.
- Also note that only crashes on actual devices can count there, simulator/desktop crashes do not count as topcrashes unless they make the product practically unusable.
- Top 5 crashes inside of what we have symbols for and support. For FxOS 1.0 & 1.1, they can be found in https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/query/query?product=B2G&version=B2G:18.0&do_query=1
- Thunderbird:
- Top 25 for Release
- Top 3 for Beta, Earlybird, Daily
- Focus only on worst of the worse, and explosive crashes, and regressions because Aurora Beta and Daily rankings don't correlate well** to final releases. So assigning topcrash status normally doesn't help significantly reduce release topcrashes. (** Probably because the respective user populations and environments are significantly different.)
- Everything:
- Bugs that spearhead investigation or fixes across a large collection of crashes
- Judging this needs engineering expertise - if fixing a bug would clean out a number of crashes (with differing signatures) that would be in similar volume to signatures matching other topcrash criteria, that bug itself qualifies for topcrash as well.
- Crashes for actions that users are rarely taking, even if they are somewhat out of the usual topcrash ranges
- This needs feeling and expertise as well, thing like that can be e.g. printing crashes in the top 50 on desktop release and similar cases.
- Bugs that spearhead investigation or fixes across a large collection of crashes