Necko:SSL v2 Sites: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(low cipher section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [https://register.btinternet.com/ https://register.btinternet.com/] | * [https://register.btinternet.com/ https://register.btinternet.com/] | ||
* [http://www.cpucityshop.co.uk/ http://www.cpucityshop.co.uk/] | * [http://www.cpucityshop.co.uk/ http://www.cpucityshop.co.uk/] | ||
* [https://www.02138magazine.com/register/ https://www.02138magazine.com/register/] | |||
Not SSL v2 but low security ciphers (other places to discuss these?): | Not SSL v2 but low security ciphers (other places to discuss these?): | ||
Revision as of 00:34, 9 June 2005
This is a list of websites known to only support SSL v2 - that is, if you turn it off, you get an error message saying that you can't access the site, or any attempt to connect to the site causes a long hang. In order for a site to be added to this list, it should be quickly accessible with SSL v2 enabled, but you should get an error message or a hang with SSL v2 disabled.
We may later attempt to contact and evangelise these sites, but at the moment this is merely a recording exercise.
- https://webmail.komtel.net/horde/imp/
- https://gnunet.org/drupal/?q=node/61
- https://www.umsu.de/ and friends at 1&1, e.g.:
- https://register.btinternet.com/
- http://www.cpucityshop.co.uk/
- https://www.02138magazine.com/register/
Not SSL v2 but low security ciphers (other places to discuss these?):
- http://www.comcastsupport.com/sdcxuser/lachat/user/userchatstart.asp
- I have disabled SSL v2, all SSL v2 ciphers, everything with less than 128 bits, MD5 and this is the only site in over a year that I have seen that does not work.
Other useful links:
- Gerv's original blog post
- Opera forum post
- Netcraft may have SSL v2 server prevalence info
- SecuritySpace has another survey, although I don't think they have figures for SSL v2 only.