Talk:Thunderbird:Extension Installation: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 17: Line 17:
The MIME type approach has a serious down side not anticipated in my prior remarks.  During discussion in mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird the issue of mirrors being used to serve add-on's was brought up.  To be workable, way too much redundancy would be required and the load on mirrors would more than double. Thus my thinking turns out to be unworkable.
The MIME type approach has a serious down side not anticipated in my prior remarks.  During discussion in mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird the issue of mirrors being used to serve add-on's was brought up.  To be workable, way too much redundancy would be required and the load on mirrors would more than double. Thus my thinking turns out to be unworkable.


What has become possible is a "Drag and Drop" ability to drag the link from the AMO site onto the Thunderbird Add-on Manager to initiate install of an extension or theme. Alternatively, those who want an archive copy can drag and drop to a desktop first and then install from there.
What has become possible is a "Drag and Drop" ability to drag the link from the AMO site onto the Thunderbird Add-on Manager to initiate install of an extension or theme. Alternatively, those who want an archive copy can drag and drop to a desktop first and then install from there.<br>
--[[User:Killjay|Ron K.]] 16:55, 9 April 2008 (PDT)
--[[User:Killjay|Ron K.]] 16:55, 9 April 2008 (PDT)


33

edits