Confirmed users
964
edits
Firefox/Activity Stream: Difference between revisions
→Signals
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
Solution: Let's experiment with a basic set of new signals that are already available (e.g. share events, etc...) and add them to a scoring system to test how we can improve relevance to users measured by CTR. | Solution: Let's experiment with a basic set of new signals that are already available (e.g. share events, etc...) and add them to a scoring system to test how we can improve relevance to users measured by CTR. | ||
Hypothesis: If we deploy a scoring/ranking system and feed it more signals making score more accurate, we will achieve higher interactions on page. | |||
Work to do this: | |||
* Andrei and team working on MVP of scoring and ranking system in Activity Stream as an experiment which can be preffed on/off. | |||
* Nan/Olivier working on storage to store signals. | |||
Two groups of signals here: | |||
* A: What user signals can we record now and feed into Activity Stream's scoring system? | |||
* B: What user signals can we enable in gecko and feed into Activity Stream's scoring system for the long term or understanding what signals matter? We could consider uplifting behind a pref, where AS can flip the pref. | |||
Actions: | |||
* Identify what signals are in A vs B - @Brendan can you identify this and update the sheet? | |||
* How do we get A into scoring system or the current query system. | |||
* Do we want to do work in gecko now to enable B signals? If yes, who can do this? | |||
==== Performance ==== | ==== Performance ==== | ||