191
edits
Drumbeat/p2pu/Assessment and Accreditation/Webcraft Assessments - detailed/Answer questions: Difference between revisions
Drumbeat/p2pu/Assessment and Accreditation/Webcraft Assessments - detailed/Answer questions (view source)
Revision as of 04:48, 1 July 2010
, 1 July 2010→Some mock-ups to consider
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
=== Some mock-ups to consider === | === Some mock-ups to consider === | ||
The first image below is a simple screenshot of the current P2PU comments section. It is taken from the [http://p2pu.org/p2pu-lounge-mar-2010 P2PU lounge], so the comments are nothing special, but ignore the text of the comments for the sake of the mock-up. | The first image below is a simple screenshot of the current P2PU comments section. It is taken from the [http://p2pu.org/p2pu-lounge-mar-2010 P2PU lounge], so the comments are nothing special, but ignore the text of the comments for the sake of the mock-up. | ||
[[File:P2PU_commenting_mock-up_1.png]] | |||
The second image shows the same image but with the community feedback feature enabled. In this case, it is a simple "Useful? (y/n)" query. Presumably people will be able to simply click on the "Y" or the "N" and the system would track who chose what and ensure that people do not vote twice on the same comment. | The second image shows the same image but with the community feedback feature enabled. In this case, it is a simple "Useful? (y/n)" query. Presumably people will be able to simply click on the "Y" or the "N" and the system would track who chose what and ensure that people do not vote twice on the same comment. | ||
[[File:P2PU_commenting_mock-up_2.png]] | |||
The third image shows the optional pop-up dialog that asks for additional information. As detailed in Section 3, above, this dialog would be hidden unless two things were true: 1) the person who wrote the original comment opted in to having it appear, and 2) someone was motivated to indicate whether the comment is useful or not. The dialog itself could be dynamic in the sense that it may only contain those specific follow-up queries and metrics which are of interest to the commenter. The terms would all need to be links to explanatory pages, and the scale may need to be fleshed out a bit. But in essence, this is all that would be necessary to have a system that can capture peer feedback at scale for various attributes of question-answering abilities. | The third image shows the optional pop-up dialog that asks for additional information. As detailed in Section 3, above, this dialog would be hidden unless two things were true: 1) the person who wrote the original comment opted in to having it appear, and 2) someone was motivated to indicate whether the comment is useful or not. The dialog itself could be dynamic in the sense that it may only contain those specific follow-up queries and metrics which are of interest to the commenter. The terms would all need to be links to explanatory pages, and the scale may need to be fleshed out a bit. But in essence, this is all that would be necessary to have a system that can capture peer feedback at scale for various attributes of question-answering abilities. | ||
[[File:P2PU_commenting_mock-up_3.png]] | [[File:P2PU_commenting_mock-up_3.png]] | ||