EU MozCamp 2011/Schedule/Engagement and Regionalization Track/Mozilla and Wikipedia: comparison of localization approaches: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Presentation slides (to provide after you talk)''':
*'''Presentation slides (to provide after you talk)''':


*'''Ideal audience size''': The number is not important, but everybody who works on tranlsation and localization should be there ;)
*'''Ideal audience size''': The number is not important, but everybody who works on translation and localization should be there ;)


*'''Equipment needs (video projector already included)''': speakers would be nice, but not mandatory.
*'''Equipment needs (video projector already included)''': speakers would be nice, but not mandatory.


*'''Submit a question for the ''speaker'' here''':
*'''Submit a question for the ''speaker'' here''':

Revision as of 18:44, 7 November 2011

Mozilla and Wikipedia: comparison of localization approaches

  • Time: 15:15
  • Duration: 45 min.
  • Summary: Mozilla and MediaWiki, the software that runs Wikipedia, are similar in being two prominent Free Software applications that are translated to many languages. However, the path of a translation from the localizer's computer to the end user is quite different in the two projects. I worked on the localization of both applications, as well as of several others, and I am going to compare the localization approaches, tools and workflows that they use.
  • Presentation slides (to provide after you talk):
  • Ideal audience size: The number is not important, but everybody who works on translation and localization should be there ;)
  • Equipment needs (video projector already included): speakers would be nice, but not mandatory.
  • Submit a question for the speaker here:
Retrieved from "https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=EU_MozCamp_2011/Schedule/Engagement_and_Regionalization_Track/Mozilla_and_Wikipedia:_comparison_of_localization_approaches&oldid=365906"