canmove, Confirmed users
2,056
edits
Firefox/Planning/2012-04-25: Difference between revisions
→Questions, Comments, FYI
| Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
== Questions, Comments, FYI == | == Questions, Comments, FYI == | ||
* myk: How does one proactively propose disabling a feature that merged to Aurora due to quality/completeness issues? | |||
** current process for disabling/backing out features is mostly reactive | |||
** drivers monitor incoming feedback and bug reports and make decisions in response to them | |||
** here's a proactive process: | |||
*** file a bug requesting feature disablement/backout | |||
*** explain the reasons for the request in the bug description | |||
*** attach a patch that disables/backs out the feature | |||
*** nominate the patch for Aurora via the approval-mozilla-aurora flag | |||
== Actions this week == | == Actions this week == | ||