CFA/Security-Notes

< CFA
Revision as of 22:00, 9 July 2007 by Galen (talk | contribs)

« Comparative Feature Analyses
« Security Research

Purpose

Examine a bunch of browsers, existing Firefox Add-ons, and web services to generate a report that describes:

  • Which capabilities each has
  • A summary of where each is different/unique
  • Some conclusions about which aspects seem most innovative and interesting that we might want to consider for Firefox

Research

General capabilities

The following will be done in a table with notes and observations following as footnotes.

  • - include malware detection and anti-phishing as security categories
  • - identify capabilities before diving in
  • - exclude "private browsing"/privacy
  • -openID
  • - users click through warnings dialogs, ignore security indicators, and focus on completing tasks. security indicators are out of the way and hard to interpret, terminology is confusing
  • - security UI must balance obviousness with unintrusiveness, convey clarity in reasonable size, and reflect complexity with simplicity - talk to Jonathan Nightingale


  • bookmarklets

Malware detection

Anti-phishing

Other

Browsers to investigate

  • Firefox 2
  • Camino
  • Flock
  • iCab
  • IE 7
  • Maxthon
  • Netscape
  • OmniWeb
  • Opera
  • Safari
  • SeaMonkey
  • Shiira

Add-ons to investigate

Firefox

  • Adblock
  • NoScript

Safari

Web services/apps to investigate

Desktop apps to investigate

Results

Summary of unique and/or innovative features

Conclusions

References