Talk:Firefox/Feature Brainstorming: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Android Brainstorming and improving Ubuntu for Android)
 
(71 intermediate revisions by 49 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Why the revert?==
==Built-in SSH Proxies==
I'm wondering why [[user:Benjamin Smedberg]] reverted my addition to this article.  He gave no reason, and the page itself says "This page is intended to collect ideas...", so I see no reason why I shouldn't put things here.  The page is for collecting ideas, and I gave an idea, so it certainly doesn't seem like vandalism to me.  If there is a good reason, then someone please TELL ME, and point me to a page where it does belong.  Until then, I'm putting back my text. -[[User:FunnyMan3595|FunnyMan3595]] 20:28, 25 Aug 2005 (PDT)


FunnyMan3595: I created a page off your User page and then linked to that, as it's how we're hoping to catalog all the design thoughts for the various issues. Thanks! -[[User:Beltzner|Beltzner]] 10:45, 31 Oct 2005 (PST)
It is very common for users of firefox to encrypt/tunnel their traffic
using SSH proxies.  I think a great feature for future versions of
firefox would be a built-in SSH engine for connecting to SSH proxies.
For example, here's my current setup:


FunnyMan3595: I wonder how I can easily spot who did revert my proposal, how did you do it? <br>- [[User:HighFish|HighFish]] 12:39, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
1) Run "ssh -D [port] u...@host.com"
2) Enter password
3) Open up the firefox options, and switch to use SOCKS on the port
specified in (1).
4) Browse securely
5) Close the ssh connection
6) Re-adjust the firefox options for normal internet connection


== Tabs switching via Mouse Scroll Wheel ==
With a built in firefox SSH mechanism, it could work like this:


This is one of the absolutely coolest Features of KDE/Qt Widgets.
1) Click a "Tunnel Traffic ON" button in firefox. (SSH accounts and
passwords would be pre-setup)
2) Browse securely
3) Click "Tunnel Traffic OFF"


It would be nice, if Firefox would allow this also, so it is blending more nively into a KDE Environment.
That would be so nice!  Any thoughts?


== Tutorial Mode ==
==Opening a tab as a web page==


I think that relying on a tutorial mode (or indeed any online help) to train anyone is a waste of time. The trouble is that all users, regardless of experience expect to be able to sit down and start using the software. People are never in the frame of mind to read documentation and instructions on how they can improve their experience, they have their own ideas about how things work. Did you read the instruction manual for your car cover to cover? For your microwave oven? No.  
How about including a feature that allows users to drag the tab into the start bar or something to open that tab in a new window.


That said, I think much of the online help could be /replaced/ (instead of augmented) by some thoughtfully designed audio/visual tutorials that linked to various help buttons, the start page, etc. E.g. a discussion about being safe online, etc. [[User:Ben|Ben]] 21:20, 18 Jan 2006 (PST)


:All users? I know with games, I find it inconvenient frequently enough when I am thrust into the game without a tutorial mode, and furthurmore when it's hard to revisit the tutorial mode to brush up. Though I do expect to be able to skip freely around the tutorial though, addressing your "cover to cover" statement. [[User:Hackwrench|Hackwrench]] 11:58, 13 October 2006 (PDT)
Another tab feature I wish FIrefox had-its in IE. It allows you to click on a button and thumbnail images of all of your tabs that are open show up on one page. Or have a feature like in iTunes 7 where you can scroll through you album artwork-except with tabs. Why not both?


== Mockups ==
== Strong support for an intelligent page-scroll! ==


Since uploading is disabled there is no way to put mockups up. Change the description in the page or turn uploads on. :-) [[User:Rauh|Rauh]] 16:29, 2 Mar 2006 (PST)
Under "Text readability improvements", topic 2 (in the article of this Feature Brainstorming page) there is described a feature, I have missed for decades in all HTML-displaying software, including Firefox...


== Adding feature ==
You all do know this:
Reading a page over more than one screen leads to a last one, which contains any text-tail, not filling the screen completely. But here, whenever you page-down to this last screen, the end of the text is placed at the bottom of the screen, and therefore at the top there is more or less of text, displayed again. From there, you've lost the last line!
From there, you always have to scan for this line, first...


I'd like to add the idea "'Make Copy' in tab context menu", but I'm not sure how to add it. Do I put it in the already-existing Tabbed Browsing cell, or do I make my own row of cells? If anyone would like to put in correctly for me, or tell me how to add it, I would be very grateful.    --[[User:Svank|Svank]] 18:37, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
This behavior is different from any other scrolling, and it's a drag in an ergonomical sense for the reader.
I've never understood, why users didn't critize this, why programers didn't change this!


==Autoupdate==
So, this feature in the way proposed seems to me overdue, really: "the previously visible area should be delimited by a frame/line for a certain period of time, after which the frame disappears or fades out, so it's easier to find the last read line."
When I tell the browser to restart it still asks me to close tabs for every window. Actually, I find this a nuisance whenever I want to close the entire browser. [[User:Hackwrench|Hackwrench]] 11:44, 13 October 2006 (PDT)
Or, similarily: simply show the last line of the previous screen at the top (for recognition, like an editor does), followed by the rest - and show an empty part beneath.


Available in 1.5.0.7, as Tools->Options->Tabs->Warn when closing multiple tabs. [[User:Tehtreag|TehTreag]]
My suspicion is, that in the stone age, somebody had decided "Never screens with empty places at the bottom! Does no look good!", and from there on, all were imitating this - till nowadays.
Imagine this crazy solution with a printed book:
at the end of every chapter, the last page starts repeating text from the page before... maybe, pretty much lines (on average clearly half a page!), just to end with a last line, always exactly at the bottom place!


Disable Pictures and Flash animations [[buttons]]
voodooyou


==Printing==
== Downloading ==
I added some references to Printing, Print UI, and Page Setup. [[User:Wildman|Wildman]] 12:46, 13 October 2006 (PDT)


== How about LESS Features? ==
I recently downloaded Firefox 2.0 and tried to download something. The "Open file with... isn't there and I have to save it first. I would like that option back.


Here's a thought: Why not focus less on adding features and more on stabilizing and slimming down the browser? There are lots of things that can be done to Mozilla that can be provided by add-ons and don't need to be in the core product. If the goal is an easy-to-use, slim browser, then we should be taking design cues from Epiphany more than Galeon (to use a Linux metaphor).[[User:Stray|Stray]] 21:07, 13 October 2006 (PDT)
i want to agree with that. you sould know it's passible to reactivate this feture by editing a config file, there are instractions on mozillazine fourms


** What about just giving the user the option to install the non-essential features during the install?  This way the minimalists can have their lean browser while it will also be able to scale up for the feature-hungry user.  This would actually make the "custom" option during install capable of actually customizing the browser.  I think this would be a better option than just removing everything and leaving advanced features to extensions.  Extensions can be intimidating for the average user and are somewhat cumbersome to maintain between browser releases. --[[User:Cloudkiller|Cloudkiller]] 09:38, 14 October 2006 (PDT)


** How about packaging those non-essential features as extensions, and have the installer able to install those if you want the full version?  You could then put as many features in extensions as you like and still have the lean browser many want.  You might need to extend the extension interface to do everything necessary but that's not necessarily a bad thing, I don't know what's possible or not at the moment. --[[User:CRedpath|CRedpath]] 17:53, 14 October 2006 (BST)
Agree and Dissagree [[User:Byzantine Dragon|Byzantine Dragon]] 06:55, 16 September 2007 (PDT)


Firefox has an inherent limitation, that is certain links cannot be downloaded.
For example in certain website when I wish to download a podcast (standard mp3) in IE6 I would right click and select 'save target as' however in Firefox 'save link as' would save a large html style file that cannot be opened.


** @Cloudkiller, I think that'd be great, but in addition to the Custom mode, I think that there should be multiple installs. A lot of installers these days have complete, minimal and custom options for installation. You could have a minimal option, a luxurious and feature-packed option, a developer option and a complete installation in addition to the custom. I don't think having four options there would be too intimidating. @CRedpath, the only problem with that is that the extensions don't update with the browser. I really hate how I have to wait sometimes months after updating to a new version before a particular extension will work with my browser again. However, users being able to make extension packs is a great idea. [[User:Ayavaron|Ayavaron]] 20:49, 14 October 2006 (PDT)
As far as download management goes, it should be an option to be able to pause a download and resume after exiting and re-opening firefox.
MOST IMPORTANTLY because certain websites prevent direct linking, a feature to add an updated link (simple copy and past operation) into the download manager


** I like this idea. There's also some interesting suggestions in section 6.2 of the article under Architecture. I think the biggest problem with this would be speed. I haven't written any extensions myself but form what I can tell their mostly done in JavaScript. Having 20-30 small JavaScript extensions running will simply be slower than having them build into the browser. Perhaps a different more efficient form of extensions (such as DLL/.so's) could be added (or is this what 'pluggins' are for?) @Ayavaron Some extensions could be considered 'supported' extensions and be developed by Mozilla people themselves, that way they could be released with the browser. --[[User:Andy753421|Andy753421]] 08:54, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
An certainly, positively, absolutely no bitorrent downloading features are necessary. Bitorrent clients need constant updating and thus it is better to use an existing client.
[[User:Byzantine Dragon|Byzantine Dragon]] 06:55, 16 September 2007 (PDT)


** Yes! Please! A minimal version! Smaller is better! --[[User:Genevieve|Genevieve]] 12:54, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
== Open ==


** I agree wholeheartedly with the concept that the basic browser should be small, but simple, stable and secure as well ....... with the ability to make the browser YOUR browser with the add-ons and extensions. This for me is what makes FireFox SO SPECIAL, THE ADD-ONS AND EXTENSIONS. In the past in general, many have created good software that has been "improved" untill the software has become too complex and USELESS. Please, Please, don't let FireFox go down this pathway. A 'Simple' browser needs very little explanation in the "Help" files.
In IE it was wery good function: when you click on exe file you can open it witchout saving! IE sucks but it's have this! Why Firefox haven't got is?


== Reintroduction of a Necessary feature ==


** This seems to be a quite important point to a number of users (including me) - and a pretty crucial one, as it really affects the direction future development is to take. Maybe you'd like to take a survey of users (and developers), whether a diet for Firefox is wished for by the general public? [[User:Daemonflower|Daemonflower]]
''I don't know where to put this so I hope its ok that I put it here!''
<ol>
<li>why can't you use Alt-Enter to access the properties of a bookmark? </li>


** I don't know what the logistics would be of adding new features in this manner, but it sounds good. You would need to be able to supply 'supported' extensions in the installer and also update them through the automatic upgrade path. I think in order to guarantee compatibility and timely upgrade these would have to be under the control of the main team and not 3rd parties. It's possible that there would be some testing benefit in delivering additional features in this manner since you would be able to install beta versions of these extensions before they became part of the normal package without needing to change to a developer build. Also, although some would no doubt be slow if written in javascript, I would expect a lot of things would perform perfectly adequately.  I have seen the example extension with the java code in it. That may be good enough for some other use cases. [[User:CRedpath|Credpath]]
<li>I really like Firefox but I find that it is missing one key feature for me to transition from Mozilla 1.7.12 to Firefox 1.5.0.4, that is the lack of the same Mozilla "Bookmark This <u>G</u>roup of Tabs" feature in Firefox.  


** I don't think anyone is saying that most of the FireFox functionality should be ''removed'' from the Core distribution - but I for one would like to see the Core distribution split into its own set of add-ons, plug-ins and extensions. This would mean that the Core Extension Set (if I may so call it) should always be in step with whatever version of FireFox is released... whether the code is being maintained as part of one big executable or as one executable and several smaller dynamic libraries/extensions should not really make ''that'' big a difference, right?  Maybe?  Perhaps?... anybody? [[User:Neoculture|Neoculture]]
Now I know that Firefox has a "Bookmark All Tabs..." option but unlike Mozilla it creates a folder just like any other and has an option to "open in tabs" at the bottom of the folder. I can see why they did this and it would be nice to be able to enter a bookmark group to access only one tab... Yet it is something that is really rarely needed and could be done by hovering over the tab group for a short while.


== Better memory management ==
Now this might seam like a minor gripe considering all the other positives Firefox has over Mozilla, Yet I am truly addicted to the bookmark group in Mozilla and there are a few main reasons behind this:
*it looks different than the other folders and is easy to distinguish
*one simple click on the bookmark group to open it
*The "Bookmark This <u>G</u>roup of Tabs" defaults to show you the file tree (for lack of a better term) giving you a quicker way to save the bookmark group.


I'm not sure if this is already planned... But at least Firefox 1.5 is not good in memory management. For example, if a page has an applet and the Java VM is called, I seem to not be able to get rid of it, and it eats a lot of memory. If I kill the java process, Firefox dies!
Now I have been unable to find any extention that would allow me to use the same Mozilla bookmark group functions inside of Firefox. Is it possable that this could be included? Pretty please! </li>
This and other little things make Firefox very slow and unstable for me (I usually hit the machine's memory limit).
</ol>
I wish Firefox was faster and used just the amount of memory it needs, and /only/ when it needs it.
I REALLY would LOVE a solution to this Please help.... Thanks! -- [[User:UKPhoenix79|UKPhoenix79]] 00:32, 3 November 2006 (PST)


I completely agree with this request, please just do something about memory management. You may use valgrind, efence lib, or whatever you want, but please don't force me to kill Firefox every Week because it wastes hundreds Megs of RAM and gets too slow...
== When? ==


Totally agree too. For me it is the most important point. I stopped to use Firefox because of this point. Firefox uses 135mo RAM just for web browsing with one tab / Opera 60mo. Furthermore gecko has a lot of performance problems : scrolling lags, with beryl or compiz with 5 tabs it's not usable... It is very important to improve this point. You can stop adding features that only few people need and improve the memory management. I think gecko need a lot of changes and maybe you use too much javascript in your application because this problem of memory management is also in Thunderbird (I stopped to use it too).
I know that the release of Firefox 2.0 has just happened but I can't wait to see the new advantages of Firefox 3.0 so when can we expect it? And by the way When and how will you tell us what features made the cut down? [[User:Carutsu|Carutsu]] 22:20, 4 November 2006 (PST)


== Arabic language and complex scripts ==
They are planning on a release in late 2007.


I [[user:Alharaka]] do not know who this is acutally addressed to, but I am part of a i18n group called arabeyes.org that does Arabic translations of FOSS stuff. I referred people to the Slashdot.org article about this list of suggestions. I have had several Arabic language suggestions:
== Colors ==


Implementing of the bidirectional algorithm *1 if it isn't already implemented so that Firefox could render Arabic phrases embedded in English texts correctly.
Perhaps one could be able to change colors of the default theme without installing a new theme, and one could color code certain websites to a color to be displayed on a tab. [[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 15:22, 7 November 2006 (PST)


There were another thing which happens when you type Arabic text in the location bar and click 'Go' .. the text gets converted to something called 'byte indicators' *2 which is very annoying ... if that could be fixed it would be great.
You could realize it by making the themes half-transparent and building in a feature to change the background color. Then you could even define different areas (for example one area for each button) and give to the users the possibility to change the color of every element of the theme. --[[User:Photon|Photon]] 00:45, 10 December 2006 (PST)


Please contact me if you want to get in touch with our group about any of these issues.
I think Firefox should use the features of the new Windows Aero graphics in Vista to make the browser transparent in some areas, that the user could choose,
so say you could see your MS Word document and see the browser somewhat at the same time.


== Cleaner Uninstallation/Extension Management ==
== Identity management at browser level with OpenID ==


Almost a year ago, I somehow broke my Firefox installation and when I uninstalled/reinstalled the program, all my extensions and settings were back to normal. I made sure the install directory was emptied and tried again. Eventually I figured out I had to delete the Firefox registry values in order to fix it. I know that there is a portable version of Firefox [http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable] so there is no reason I should need to muck around in my registry to uninstall things.  
Current foreseen enhancements to identity management are only small tweaks. A real step ahead would be to include openID management at the browser level, as suggested in the [http://iwantmyopenid.org/bounty comments here].


If extensions could install to a folder like the plugins in Photoshop, they'd be much easier to deal with. I have no idea how technically possible that would be and I'm almost certain that it'd break a lot of existing extensions. There could be an option to delete the extensions and settings folders during uninstallation too. It'd be nice also to be able to manage extensions in the file browser just by deleting them from the extensions folder. [[User:Ayavaron|Ayavaron]] 21:10, 14 October 2006 (PDT)
This would simply revolutionize everyone's identity online, since what all web sites are waiting for is just some sort of support similar to what Mozilla/Firefox could bring. Everyone's waiting for that, but just not doing it because of this lack of support.


==Message for Microsoft==
It would really make life easier to both site owners and visitors.
* Each time Firefox loads it could send a request for this non-existant page, http://microsoft.com/firefox_rulz_OK or something similar (but not accept any data in return of course). :-) [[User:Rossnixon|Rossnixon]] 21:53, 14 October 2006 (PDT)


* I see neither use nor fun nor any kind of satisfaction in this. MS knows Firefox exists. Also, this could be seen as a recommendation to spam MS. I wouldn't even encourage an extension doing this. --[[User:PullMeUnder|PullMeUnder]] 11:44, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
Of course users should be able to switch identities from within the browser.
Ultimately, that could mean not signing in anymore to any compatible web site as you would just do it once at the browser level.


==Tabbed Download Manager==
[http://wiki.mozilla.org/User:NatC NatC]
How about having the choice of having the download manager become a background tab instead of being another window. Also having options of it being in the background or foreground tab.


Have something like Mercury Test director, while opening the Test director page for the first time in browser, it basically downloads different plugins and we see the status of each plugin download.
== Print what you see ==


== Backgrounds Management ==
I would like to see the feature print what you see in the print properties. How can I make that the new firefox has it? More info about my idea: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox:Printing_what_you_see


How about Backgrounds Management . The main source for desktop Backgrounds is the internet . Why don't we build Backgrounds Management that hold all the recent backgrounds that the person download .We can add a preview to background that the muse is on top of it . maybe we can have folders organization in it as well .
== Master Password and password security ==
shortly jast have a Backgrounds Management ...


== Minimize tab ==
Dear Firefox developers et al.,


* Keep it open, but hidden from tab bar; probably will be still visible in the list. Notify user when title changes. Think Gmail, Yahoo Mail, which you want to keep open, and get notified when there's new mail.
I enjoy saving passwords, it makes my life a little less complicated, however I hate having them easily exposed by someone going to my preferences and being able to view them with relative ease.
* I feature I would've never thought of, but it sounds very reasonable. Also this sounds so integral to the browsing experience that I think an inclusion in the browser itself rather than in an extension would make sense.--[[User:PullMeUnder|PullMeUnder]] 11:46, 15 October 2006 (PDT)


== Fast bookmark search ==
It has come to my attention that the master password feature is ultimately useless, I presume that many people use a same or similar password for most of their user accounts and that the master password STILL requires a password to be entered simply to allow someone to have it inputed automatically.


Auto-complete style, by keyword/name/address/description.
My suggestion is to have a security center password which is required to view/delete/add saved passwords.  Passwords that are saved are accessible without the need for entering a master one when viewing such a page.  The saved passwords function as they would without a master password, the only change being as far as viewing them, adding them, and deleting them.


== Form navigation via keyboard on Mac ==
The master password idea is good but for now I cannot save passwords because either the security risk is too great or the hassle (because I still need to enter a pw) is too great.


On windows, I can tab through not only text fields, but check boxes and form buttons, and change or activate them using the space button.  On the mac, I can only do checkboxes and buttons with the mouse.  Please provide an option to be able to tab through these things on the mac.  Thanks.
This site is also somewhat difficult to come by, my apologies in advance for posting in the wrong location.


== UTF-8 on URL bar ==
Please return the spirit of the saved password to its rightful place so I may once again browse 100% happy.
It would be nice to add support to enable UTF-8 in URL bar, Opera have this "option". Currently Firefox show utf-8 urls like this: "%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0" instead of this: "Србија".�One sample is [http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0 Serbian Wikipedia]. There is bug for this feature [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105909 here]. Thanks a lot --[[User:Djevrek|Djevrek]] 07:59, 15 October 2006 (PDT)


== Javascript-Div-Update-Replacement (Ajax topic)  ==
== Extensions Resource Tracking - enhancing comment ==


It would be great to have mechanism to define a panel, where data may be send to a server and its response is rendered into a certain area like:
''I'm new here. Hopefully this is OK.''
''This is an addition of a point already present in the list''


<asynch-panel refpanel="myPanel" refid="test" /> <asynch-panel name="myPanel" target="http://blabla.de/bsp.jsp"> <input type="text" id="test" value="<%="blabla"%>" /> <input type="submit" /> </asynch-panel>
I propose to track both resources usage (memory, cache, time) and healthy statistics per-extension basis, for tuning purposes. Something like the Task Manager but for extensions, so if my FF is poorly responsive, I can track down the culprit extension.


Of course such panels would allow nested panels and form elements to have maximum control.
Additionally, I'd like to know: a) wheather a crash (latest) was caused by an extension (and which one), enabling a crash-counter, and b) track installation date for every extension (more extension data: installation date, latest enabling and disabling, etc).


I know that such an extension would be only usable for Firefox users, but it would speed up asynch development at leat in closed user groups with certain system requirements.  
Finally, IMHO, a health-checker for extensions would be very useful, for example monitoring errors (as shown in the console). I would like to track what changes I see in my FF that were caused by each extension. Too much? Ok, then, I would like to know what changes an extension is about to do during installation, and optionally enable/disable the 'priviledges' of extensions, so I don't get surprises when installing extensions.


What do you think about this?
Hope these comments are useful!
Daniel.


== Take over browserhistory when opening a new tab ==
== Mac resize thing should be transparent ==


Hi, i think it would be fine, if firefox takes over the surf history (for button-back) when opening a new tab by a link of the currently tab.
On the mac version, the thing below the scrollbar that lets you resize the window should be transparent as it is in Safari. There should at least be an option to do this.


== The Ctrl + Enter opening new tab ==


* Hello, I wanted to know - is it podsible to add a feature that was in mozilla to firefox - when you used mozilla and when you was writing some site in the address bar and by clicking Ctrl + Enter it would take you to another tab - it was almous as duplicating tabs ( F6 and the Ctrl + Enter was the duplication itself ).
== The Addressbar ==


* I might be stupid and fail to see what this is about, but: This already works perfectly, an has done so for ages. When I enter an address in the address bar and hit CTRL+Enter, a new tab is opened. If that is only because I have installed Tabmix Plus, somebody please remove this remark.--[[User:PullMeUnder|PullMeUnder]] 11:54, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
The addressbar is the absolute heart* of the user's experience of a browser. It is also the most complicated, diverse and unpredictable, because of the richness of URLs and the necessity of a keyboard to adjust them. Of all the buttons, menus, extensions and other features, surely the addressbar is the one that it here to stay, however many Web 2.0-10.0 we get through? We are not yet at the point where we can navigate without it.


== Add a Page Zoom feature (like IE7) ==
So I am amazed how little it has changed over the years. Then the excellent Locationbar^2 came along (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4014). What a creative idea! Locationbar simply must be incorporated into Firefox - it is a way that Firefox can once again set the agenda on the web.
* You need to put a little zoom-in and zoom-out feature in the bottom right of the browser.


* As far as I know, pictures that are to large to be displayed are automatically shrunk. You then have the option to display the picture fullsize nonetheless, then having to scroll, of course. For full zooming capabilities, there is a respective extension available. --[[User:PullMeUnder|PullMeUnder]] 11:54, 15 October 2006 (PDT)
Sadly I am devoid of ideas, but I want to ask the question, what else can we do to the addressbar to take advantage of it? A parser, to interpret segments and offer alternatives (from a look-up) to load? Right-clicking reveals a helpful context menu: download all media from this level; correct the spelling and reload, all in one; execute/download/give help on e.g. a php script?


* The current Firefox PageZoom extension only modifies the page's CSS, which NEVER scales correctly - that, and it is extremely slow.  IE7's new zoom is very slick, and I can only assume it uses some kind of compositing engine, as the scaled pages look perfect.  This feature is a must-have for v3 - as screen resolutions like 1600x1200 and up become standard, this feature will be a necessity.
(*apart from the content itself)


== cache managment like in IE ==


an option to manage the cache like in "temporary internet files".
== Close Button on the Right ==


== multiple processes ==
I really miss in firefox 2.0.x the old close button to close your current tab that was located in firefox 1.5.x on the right. I find it really usefull and confortable because you don't have to change each time the area you click with your mouse to close your current tab.


Firefox runs in one process, which is problematic if
Thank you for hearing my suggestion! What do you thing about?
this process freezes on must load JAVA or acrobat reader.
*Although I like FF2's way of closing tabs, it does have its downsides, and many people do like the previous versions' way of closing tabs. I think users should have the freedom to close browsers both ways, if they please. --[[User:Armaetin|Armaetin]] 22:28, 9 April 2007 (PDT)
the solution is to enable running multiple processes, using the same profile
**I thing it's a very good idea, that anybody could choose between the two interfaces, although i thing it would increase performance anyway just adding the close button on the right. It would be like an hybrid between the two previous firefox versions, if we keep the actual close buttons of each tab like firefox 2.0.x and we just add the close button on the right like like firefox 1.5.x. What do you thing about this idea? --[[User:Borgg|Borgg]] 11:39, 10 April 2007
***[http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Feature_Brainstorming:Tabs%2C_Sidebar%2C_Windows#Last_Tab_stretches_all_the_way_to_end Here's a similar suggestion that some people might like.] --[[User:Armaetin|Armaetin]] 10:17, 10 April 2007 (PDT)


== Additional user feedback ==
==Allow Multiple Restore Sessions==
The restore session is very handy for bringing up your usual web pages. It should be further enhanced by allowing a choice of several sessions that you have saved. If you don't know what I'm talking about -- its under "startup" in Firefox's preferences.


[[http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?threshold=4&mode=thread&commentsort=0&op=Change&sid=200759]]
(ripped from missingparts.org)
http://www.missingparts.org/request/show_full_request/14


There's a lot of it here, including:
== Browser enhancement to queue links that you want to follow ==
Someone should write a plugin for Firefox or other browser(s) that lets you queue up links you want to follow from search results. For example, say you have results from a craigslist query and you want to follow several of them. Instead of opening each link in a new tab or window, you would be able to control click (or some other key combination) that would place the link to follow on a list. Then the browser would have a special icon to load up the next link when you are ready.


''much like what Pandora did for music, I want firefox to do for porn. If I allow it, it can read the porn sites I frequent and suggest new sites that I might enjoy.''
(ripped from missingparts.org)
http://www.missingparts.org/request/show_full_request/13


..and a lot of serious suggestions too ;)
==  Smart browser caching ==
There should be some web code technology that tells a browser which links are followed most often (based on statistics) for a certain page in order for the browser to load those pages in the background. To the vistor, they'd see a great performance increase and it'd all be behind the scenes.


== Ad-Blocking must have. ==
For example for index.html, there are ten links: link1, link2, link3, etc. If the site gathered statistics on each of the links and found that most often vistors click link3 the most for index.html, then there might be a bit of code to let the browser know to load the page link3 refers to in the background in anticipation of the click. Something like <rating tag> link3 <end rating tag>
(ripped from missingparts.org)
http://www.missingparts.org/request/show_full_request/24


must have its own adblock
== Updating Feature Requests ==


I agree, please integrate Ad Block and filterset updater so all users can benefit from an ad free web. Hit Google and another annoying ad companies where it hurts.
Shouldn't we keep all feature request pages updated? What i mean is, isn't it a good idea to delete requests that have been implemented since they were initially posted?
That way we can keep all the pages up to date and imo, render them more useful for developers who check them etc...
[[User:ChaoticMind|ChaoticMind]] 06:28, 28 April 2007 (PDT)
*You could help do that. I clean up pages of its obsolete ideas sometimes because the admins/moderators do not appear to do that for us. --[[User:Armaetin|Armaetin]] 16:49, 28 April 2007 (PDT)
*It may be helpful to strike through <strike>implemented suggestions</strike> so people won't suggest them again. --[[User:TastyWheat|TastyWheat]] <small>([[User_talk:TastyWheat|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/TastyWheat|contribs]])</small> 01:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


would be nice, but might be dangerous as removing an ad could be considered a copyright violation. Also don't forget that lots of sites can only be kept on the net by money from advertising. --[[User:Fluffysheep|Fluffysheep]] 14:56, 16 October 2006 (PDT)
== Great things other browsers use (Opera)==


== Don't display blocked sections of pages ==
I'm drawing from my experience with other browsers such as Opera.
I'm a zealous HOSTS file user and I'm still using FF 1.0.7 because it looks much cleaner without all the the "unable to connect" messages where all the ads would be.  PLEASE put in an option to hide these messages a la 1.0.7.


== Reload all tabs ==
Firefox 3 needs a solid base on which to work on (which is being done) but it need a few more things, such as:


There's a View->Reload for the current tab, and bookmark groups to open several new tabs at once, but there's no "Reload All" to refresh all currently visible tabs.
The ability to store/save and restore loaded pages like in Opera after re-opening the browser (last viewed pages are there - no need to download again)


Usage example: I often use to "open in tabs" a bookmark group, then start closing some tabs and then I want to "Reload All" periodically the remaining tabs. Right now I have to either reload each tab manually (tedious if you have for instance 20 tabs), or re-open again all links in the bookmark group (this will open more tabs than the ones I have now visible and want to reload).
Some king of speed-dial feature like in Opera (this would work great in FIrefox)


Edit: This can already be done (at least in Firefox 1.5 under Windows).  Right-click on any of the tabs and select Reload All Tabs.  -kcolagio
Ability to resume downloads after closing Firefox and change download links (mentioned above) - simple download properties box


== HTML Validation ==
Perhaps incorporation of Widgets


I don't know if this is already planned for versions 2 or 3, so please forgive me if it is.
No need to go overboard with torrent clients and other shenanigans that just clutter the browser. Only simple, helpful and powerful features to increase browsing efficiency.


As Firefox gets better at standards compliance, it could help the cause by alerting the user (who is often a developer) in a not-too-annoying way whenever it encounters malformed HTML, instead of just silently ignoring and reinterpreting it. This would be similar to what it does with bad JavaScript. Besides helping the cause, this would also be useful in cases where FF and other browsers interpret the same HTML differently, because FF would at least have something to blame. (Assuming FF's interpretation is correct.)
MHT READ WRITE SUPPORT IS ESSENTIAL WITHOUT IT OPERA OR INTERNET EXPLORER BECOMES CRUCIAL


There's an HTML validator plugin, but why should Firefox have to interpret the same code twice? (Once by Firefox for display, and once by the plugin for validation.)
Addressbar's "Paste and Go" feature like in Opera would be VERY useful


== Multiple tabs actions & too much tabs ==
"Go to address", "Search in >" for the selected text in the right click menu, not only "Search in Google"


Is it posible to do some actions to tabs like say to move them from one place to another but say with "Cntr" to pick a couple of them an do whatever you can do.
==Unresponsive script dialog==
When an unresponsive script is detected, firefox should immediately pause execution (instead of letting it run while giving you an option to stop it) to prevent a page from locking up the browser.


ahh and P.S. - I think it would be good if you will add a scroll bar to the tab meny when there are more tabs then it shows - something like say 50 tabs and I can see it all - it would be great if I would have an arrow to get to the next tabs as well.
There's no need to keep scripts running once they're unresponsive.


: I ''think'' what this user wants is already possible with a variety of tab-enhancement extensions. I personally couldn't live without the some of the features of e.g. tabmix plus, but I don't see any necessity for this to be core material.--[[User:PullMeUnder|PullMeUnder]] 15:51, 16 October 2006 (PDT)
== How about making the Stop button work more often? ==


== Keyboard Shortcuts: Web Address Localisation support ==
I know, it's not exactly a feature maybe, but their are _lot_ of posts on various sites about FF being 'unresponsive' under a variety of conditions


At present, it's possible to shortcut domain names for .com .net and .org addresses by using CTRL (or Option on Macs), Shift, or a combination of the two (i.e. type getfirefox in the address bar, then use CTRL+Enter to fill in the www. and .com parts).
(This includes but is not limited to server not responding, while downloading large files such as podcasts, if a script becomes unresponsive, .. )


I use this feature regularly, but come a cropper every time I try and do this with a .co.uk address, and end up having to go and edit the beginning and end of the address.
If the Stop button worked in more cases, many of these situations would be recoverable - many problems solved (or at least recovered from) with one improvment.


I suggest it might be a handy improvement for the user to be able to choose the function of at least one of these shortcuts (or add a 4th one) so that it will autocomplete for their desired country.  (So typing bbc would be expanded to www.bbc.co.uk for example)
== Blink taskbar ==


== Link Activation ==
Firefox could blink taskbar like messenger does. There are a lot of web messengers on the web begging for this feature. The users would appreciate it. I missed a lot of messages because I didn't see there was a new message. The feature could be used by a lot of applications, not only messengers.


It has been suggested that when you mouse-over a link it will display the link.  I think it would be great for Firefox to display the type of file being linked.  This can help people who are less computer-literate avoid falling for phishing scams and downloading executables when they expect to go to a webpage.  This should be optional to enable, and it should only show common file types that can be potentially dangerous.
This feature could be implemented in javascript function.


== Improve RSS presentation ==
== User Profiles ==


I've never been happy with the way Firefox displays RSS feeds, and version 2 is no improvement. IMHO, the user experience of both Safari and Google Reader are vastly superior to FF:
Firefox will startup and ask if you want to login to a profile or continue with default, if you choose default, the normal Firefox starts but with a user name, the person will have a seperate bookmarks and history and things.


*  Unread articles are collected into a single page, not one article per page or per tab. Reading through all new material is simply a matter of scrolling down (just like reading a newspaper or magazine!) instead of having to switch tabs.
The information is encrypted and kept locally so internet speed isnt slowed down..
*  Article summaries are shown, not just titles. (Or complete articles if you prefer, which I do.)
*  In Safari, the number of unread articles is shown in the bookmark as a number next to the name, like this: "Slashdot (8)"


The experience I want is to be able to get up in the morning, walk over to my computer, and read the newspaper while I am waking up. Only in this case, the "newspaper" is something the browser assembled for me based on my interests. If I am not interested in an article, I can just scroll past it - I don't want to have to manually select which articles I am or am not interested in.
== Report abuse button ==


== Allow plugins and skins to load without having to restart ==
I want to propose a new addition to Firefox. I was watching a program about child safety online. One of the things that I found interesting was that the CEO of [http://www.ceop.gov.uk CEOP website] was praising Microsoft's Instant Messenger Service because there was a "Report Abuse" button that linked to the appropriate enforcement agencies.


This has been a constant annoyance, and I know there's probably some security reason for it, but I'd like to be able to enable and disable addins and switch skins without having to restart firefox every time. I wouldn't mind if there was still a restart on initial installation, but for already installed skins and addins, it gets tiresome quickly.
Is it possible to add a similar button to the actual web browser? I know that this will require much more thought about how to engage with agencies, where to place such a button (Navgiation toolbar?), etc.
 
I thought I would put the idea out there to see if this is possible. [[User:Khandes3|Khandes3]] 15:47, 23 March 2008 (PDT)
 
== Add "always on top" option for open window(s) ==
 
This would make it possible to watch Hulu in the pop-out player, and have it always visible.
 
== GetURL for TinyURL and similar addresses ==
 
I would love to see a feature that would let users mouse over a shortened link (like one provided by TinyURL or such) and would display the full web address of the re-direct.
[[User:TheUncleBob|TheUncleBob]] 16:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 
== Tab Locking ==
 
The idea of tab locking is a good idea. However I don't think it should be limited to only to the domain as the original creator suggested in the Brainstorming section. My reasoning behind this has to deal with watching video. If I am watching a video that happens to be a bit long, I generally do some other browsing in other tabs. Sometimes I accidentally navigate off of my movie page.
 
I believe a tab locking feature that would prevent me from navigating away to any other page would be best. Or even as was originally suggested, forced an "open in new tab" for the locked page.
 
Also it should prevent me from being able to drag the tab into a new browser window, or at least have the option to prevent this. When I am on a page with a flash movie playing, sometimes i click on the tab and accidentally move it just slightly and it opens a browser window with that page and the flash video resets.
 
== User-specified Java runtime ==
I suggest to implement a way (e.g. config parameter, command-line option, ...) to instruct FireFox not to use the Java runtime found automatically (e.g. by scanning Windows registry), but instead a different one specified by the user. For instance, when using Portable Firefox off a USB stick, it would be very useful to be able to run a Java applet via a Java runtime installed on the same removable storage.
 
 
== Advanced tab loading control ==
I don't generally use bookmarks because I'm too busy to ever look back at them anyway. Instead, when I find a Web page that interests me, whether I've already read through it or intend to at a later date, I leave the tab open and let the session manager save it.
 
This works awesome and allows me to stumble upon Web sites or topics that I had forgotten about. As a computer programmer, I'm often trying to learn about multiple subjects at the same time and this allows me to keep useful material available for me to find later when I have time to work through it.
 
Unfortunately, this leads me to have sessions with 50 or 60 or more tabs open. It isn't a problem for most of the day, but everyday when I first start Firefox (and occasionally throughout the day as some OSes force me to restart the computer) I have to wait a LONG time for Firefox to become responsive because it's busy loading all of those tabs, many of them from very expensive sites. Additionally, the session often includes multiple tabs from YouTube or the like, which all start playing as soon as they've loaded; not only wasting resources, but forcing me to search through the mess of tabs to pause the playback.
 
I was pleased to find that somebody had already suggested a solution[https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Feature_Brainstorming:Tabs,_Sidebar,_Windows#Advanced_tab_loading_control]. Loading the session, but refraining from actually loading every tab until requested. In practice, I probably have between 3 and 10 tabs that I use regularly, while the rest are just there for me to rediscover when I have time for them. It would be nice if those X tabs that I regularly use would load when the session is loaded, but the remainder would just load empty or placeholder tabs that are waiting for user interaction before loading. Firefox could also [optionally?] load these other tabs incrementally over time as it finds itself running idly.
 
This would greatly improve the user experience of Firefox for myself (and many others I've heard do this).
 
 
 
==Disable Backspace==
[[Firefox/Feature Brainstorming:User Interface#Disable Backspace Navigation]]
A very good suggestion. But perhaps instead, make hotkeys modifiable.
 
== Performance ==
 
As many guys have already said: Firefox is too slow in terms of its start-up time. This is also the main reason why other people choose a different browser (for marketing aspects ;) )<br />
I list a few thoughts about how to shorten the start-up time (Could be alreay implemented though). In general, it is a good idea to start particular things delayed after FF has already been started (see superfetch at Windows Vista/7).
 
<ul>
<li> Do not instantiate views of the menu at start-up (I think this is partly implemented).</li>
<li> Do not build the full bookmark list. Use lazy displaying of invisible nodes of folders.</li>
<li> Do not load all plugins at start-up. Surely, some plugins really need to start at once, but some do not. Add a bool-value for plugin developers to enable/disable start-up at once.</li>
</ul>
 
 
Feel free to add other ideas!
 
== Tab Focus Stack ==
 
This is a pretty simple feature to implement, but I think it would be very useful. Currently when a tab is closed, the tab to the right of it in the window is brought to focus by default. This is usually not a helpful behavior. If Firefox implements a stack of Tab-IDs so that whenever a tab is detached, closed, crashes, etc... it is popped off the stack and the focus returns the next tab at the top of the stack, we can save numerous keystrokes for us multitaskers.
 
EXAMPLE:
 
Right now, you have 5 tabs open in the current window. You are focused on the right-most tab of the window. But you want to pop the left-most tab into another/(or its own) window (imagine you are playing a game in one window and reading a guide in the other, or writing code and following a doc page, or sending out event invitations while looking at the address/telephone/amenities of the venue). Right now, if you simply drag the left-most tab to detach it, focus is brought to the new left-most tab of your original window, rather than the tab you most recently had focus on.
 
What I would like to happen is that once I detach the leftmost tab, the rightmost tab (on which I was most recently focused) would be the tab that pops back into focus.
 
Implementation issues:
We don't want to slow down the browser by maintaining a potentially very deep list of focus. So what we can do is create a fixed-depth stack that only stores (at most) the N most recent tabs with focus. There are many acceptable ways to implement this, but the most lightweight would probably be to use an array with an index that is incremented/modulo-N. When we pop off an tab id, we can set the slot in the array corresponding to the current index to a null or -1 and then decrement our index.
 
Realistically, however, even a very deep stack of integers will not be a bottleneck.
 
==Android Brainstorming==
 
I searched through the Wiki but couldn't find a proper section about mobile (smartphone and tablet) brainstorming.
As Android is the most important platform (until Firefox OS is successfully enough) and Firefox 15 Beta is much better than the previous versions, I would propose a dedicated section "Android (smartphone/tablet)" to gather ideas.
 
I suppose that Android users are even less technical than desktop users, so a [[Firefox/Feature Brainstorming]] wiki section should attract more ideas than bugzilla tickets.
 
[http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Thailand-distributes-800-000-Android-tablets-to-students-1648542.html Thailand distributes 800,000 free Android tablets to students]
 
==Ubuntu for Android==
 
Now that the biggest online games company [http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE0MTY Valve is embracing Linux] and [http://blog.canonical.com/2012/07/19/introducing-ubuntu-web-apps-setting-the-web-free-of-the-browser/ Ubuntu is integrating webapps into the desktop], I would suggest improving [http://soltesza.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/why-ubuntu-for-android-is-the-most-important-linux-project-today/ Ubuntu for Android is the most important Linux project] besides Firefox OS.
 
Please help to generalize the [http://developer.ubuntu.com/api/ubuntu-12.04/javascript/index.html Unity Web API] into a freedesktop standard and build a Firefox version optimized for low-cost Linux (ARM) devices (especially while [http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2012/05/firefox-on-windows-o.html Microsoft bans Firefox on ARM-based Windows]).
 
[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/15/punjab_ubuntu_free_laptops_students/ Pakistan provides 500,000 free Ubuntu laptops to students]

Latest revision as of 11:41, 21 July 2012

Built-in SSH Proxies

It is very common for users of firefox to encrypt/tunnel their traffic using SSH proxies. I think a great feature for future versions of firefox would be a built-in SSH engine for connecting to SSH proxies. For example, here's my current setup:

1) Run "ssh -D [port] u...@host.com" 2) Enter password 3) Open up the firefox options, and switch to use SOCKS on the port specified in (1). 4) Browse securely 5) Close the ssh connection 6) Re-adjust the firefox options for normal internet connection

With a built in firefox SSH mechanism, it could work like this:

1) Click a "Tunnel Traffic ON" button in firefox. (SSH accounts and passwords would be pre-setup) 2) Browse securely 3) Click "Tunnel Traffic OFF"

That would be so nice! Any thoughts?

Opening a tab as a web page

How about including a feature that allows users to drag the tab into the start bar or something to open that tab in a new window.


Another tab feature I wish FIrefox had-its in IE. It allows you to click on a button and thumbnail images of all of your tabs that are open show up on one page. Or have a feature like in iTunes 7 where you can scroll through you album artwork-except with tabs. Why not both?

Strong support for an intelligent page-scroll!

Under "Text readability improvements", topic 2 (in the article of this Feature Brainstorming page) there is described a feature, I have missed for decades in all HTML-displaying software, including Firefox...

You all do know this: Reading a page over more than one screen leads to a last one, which contains any text-tail, not filling the screen completely. But here, whenever you page-down to this last screen, the end of the text is placed at the bottom of the screen, and therefore at the top there is more or less of text, displayed again. From there, you've lost the last line! From there, you always have to scan for this line, first...

This behavior is different from any other scrolling, and it's a drag in an ergonomical sense for the reader. I've never understood, why users didn't critize this, why programers didn't change this!

So, this feature in the way proposed seems to me overdue, really: "the previously visible area should be delimited by a frame/line for a certain period of time, after which the frame disappears or fades out, so it's easier to find the last read line." Or, similarily: simply show the last line of the previous screen at the top (for recognition, like an editor does), followed by the rest - and show an empty part beneath.

My suspicion is, that in the stone age, somebody had decided "Never screens with empty places at the bottom! Does no look good!", and from there on, all were imitating this - till nowadays. Imagine this crazy solution with a printed book: at the end of every chapter, the last page starts repeating text from the page before... maybe, pretty much lines (on average clearly half a page!), just to end with a last line, always exactly at the bottom place!

voodooyou

Downloading

I recently downloaded Firefox 2.0 and tried to download something. The "Open file with... isn't there and I have to save it first. I would like that option back.

i want to agree with that. you sould know it's passible to reactivate this feture by editing a config file, there are instractions on mozillazine fourms


Agree and Dissagree Byzantine Dragon 06:55, 16 September 2007 (PDT)

Firefox has an inherent limitation, that is certain links cannot be downloaded. For example in certain website when I wish to download a podcast (standard mp3) in IE6 I would right click and select 'save target as' however in Firefox 'save link as' would save a large html style file that cannot be opened.

As far as download management goes, it should be an option to be able to pause a download and resume after exiting and re-opening firefox. MOST IMPORTANTLY because certain websites prevent direct linking, a feature to add an updated link (simple copy and past operation) into the download manager

An certainly, positively, absolutely no bitorrent downloading features are necessary. Bitorrent clients need constant updating and thus it is better to use an existing client. Byzantine Dragon 06:55, 16 September 2007 (PDT)

Open

In IE it was wery good function: when you click on exe file you can open it witchout saving! IE sucks but it's have this! Why Firefox haven't got is?

Reintroduction of a Necessary feature

I don't know where to put this so I hope its ok that I put it here!

  1. why can't you use Alt-Enter to access the properties of a bookmark?
  2. I really like Firefox but I find that it is missing one key feature for me to transition from Mozilla 1.7.12 to Firefox 1.5.0.4, that is the lack of the same Mozilla "Bookmark This Group of Tabs" feature in Firefox. Now I know that Firefox has a "Bookmark All Tabs..." option but unlike Mozilla it creates a folder just like any other and has an option to "open in tabs" at the bottom of the folder. I can see why they did this and it would be nice to be able to enter a bookmark group to access only one tab... Yet it is something that is really rarely needed and could be done by hovering over the tab group for a short while. Now this might seam like a minor gripe considering all the other positives Firefox has over Mozilla, Yet I am truly addicted to the bookmark group in Mozilla and there are a few main reasons behind this:
    • it looks different than the other folders and is easy to distinguish
    • one simple click on the bookmark group to open it
    • The "Bookmark This Group of Tabs" defaults to show you the file tree (for lack of a better term) giving you a quicker way to save the bookmark group.
    Now I have been unable to find any extention that would allow me to use the same Mozilla bookmark group functions inside of Firefox. Is it possable that this could be included? Pretty please!

I REALLY would LOVE a solution to this Please help.... Thanks! -- UKPhoenix79 00:32, 3 November 2006 (PST)

When?

I know that the release of Firefox 2.0 has just happened but I can't wait to see the new advantages of Firefox 3.0 so when can we expect it? And by the way When and how will you tell us what features made the cut down? Carutsu 22:20, 4 November 2006 (PST)

They are planning on a release in late 2007.

Colors

Perhaps one could be able to change colors of the default theme without installing a new theme, and one could color code certain websites to a color to be displayed on a tab. Jimmy 15:22, 7 November 2006 (PST)

You could realize it by making the themes half-transparent and building in a feature to change the background color. Then you could even define different areas (for example one area for each button) and give to the users the possibility to change the color of every element of the theme. --Photon 00:45, 10 December 2006 (PST)

I think Firefox should use the features of the new Windows Aero graphics in Vista to make the browser transparent in some areas, that the user could choose, so say you could see your MS Word document and see the browser somewhat at the same time.

Identity management at browser level with OpenID

Current foreseen enhancements to identity management are only small tweaks. A real step ahead would be to include openID management at the browser level, as suggested in the comments here.

This would simply revolutionize everyone's identity online, since what all web sites are waiting for is just some sort of support similar to what Mozilla/Firefox could bring. Everyone's waiting for that, but just not doing it because of this lack of support.

It would really make life easier to both site owners and visitors.

Of course users should be able to switch identities from within the browser. Ultimately, that could mean not signing in anymore to any compatible web site as you would just do it once at the browser level.

NatC

Print what you see

I would like to see the feature print what you see in the print properties. How can I make that the new firefox has it? More info about my idea: http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox:Printing_what_you_see

Master Password and password security

Dear Firefox developers et al.,

I enjoy saving passwords, it makes my life a little less complicated, however I hate having them easily exposed by someone going to my preferences and being able to view them with relative ease.

It has come to my attention that the master password feature is ultimately useless, I presume that many people use a same or similar password for most of their user accounts and that the master password STILL requires a password to be entered simply to allow someone to have it inputed automatically.

My suggestion is to have a security center password which is required to view/delete/add saved passwords. Passwords that are saved are accessible without the need for entering a master one when viewing such a page. The saved passwords function as they would without a master password, the only change being as far as viewing them, adding them, and deleting them.

The master password idea is good but for now I cannot save passwords because either the security risk is too great or the hassle (because I still need to enter a pw) is too great.

This site is also somewhat difficult to come by, my apologies in advance for posting in the wrong location.

Please return the spirit of the saved password to its rightful place so I may once again browse 100% happy.

Extensions Resource Tracking - enhancing comment

I'm new here. Hopefully this is OK. This is an addition of a point already present in the list

I propose to track both resources usage (memory, cache, time) and healthy statistics per-extension basis, for tuning purposes. Something like the Task Manager but for extensions, so if my FF is poorly responsive, I can track down the culprit extension.

Additionally, I'd like to know: a) wheather a crash (latest) was caused by an extension (and which one), enabling a crash-counter, and b) track installation date for every extension (more extension data: installation date, latest enabling and disabling, etc).

Finally, IMHO, a health-checker for extensions would be very useful, for example monitoring errors (as shown in the console). I would like to track what changes I see in my FF that were caused by each extension. Too much? Ok, then, I would like to know what changes an extension is about to do during installation, and optionally enable/disable the 'priviledges' of extensions, so I don't get surprises when installing extensions.

Hope these comments are useful! Daniel.

Mac resize thing should be transparent

On the mac version, the thing below the scrollbar that lets you resize the window should be transparent as it is in Safari. There should at least be an option to do this.


The Addressbar

The addressbar is the absolute heart* of the user's experience of a browser. It is also the most complicated, diverse and unpredictable, because of the richness of URLs and the necessity of a keyboard to adjust them. Of all the buttons, menus, extensions and other features, surely the addressbar is the one that it here to stay, however many Web 2.0-10.0 we get through? We are not yet at the point where we can navigate without it.

So I am amazed how little it has changed over the years. Then the excellent Locationbar^2 came along (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4014). What a creative idea! Locationbar simply must be incorporated into Firefox - it is a way that Firefox can once again set the agenda on the web.

Sadly I am devoid of ideas, but I want to ask the question, what else can we do to the addressbar to take advantage of it? A parser, to interpret segments and offer alternatives (from a look-up) to load? Right-clicking reveals a helpful context menu: download all media from this level; correct the spelling and reload, all in one; execute/download/give help on e.g. a php script?

(*apart from the content itself)


Close Button on the Right

I really miss in firefox 2.0.x the old close button to close your current tab that was located in firefox 1.5.x on the right. I find it really usefull and confortable because you don't have to change each time the area you click with your mouse to close your current tab.

Thank you for hearing my suggestion! What do you thing about?

  • Although I like FF2's way of closing tabs, it does have its downsides, and many people do like the previous versions' way of closing tabs. I think users should have the freedom to close browsers both ways, if they please. --Armaetin 22:28, 9 April 2007 (PDT)
    • I thing it's a very good idea, that anybody could choose between the two interfaces, although i thing it would increase performance anyway just adding the close button on the right. It would be like an hybrid between the two previous firefox versions, if we keep the actual close buttons of each tab like firefox 2.0.x and we just add the close button on the right like like firefox 1.5.x. What do you thing about this idea? --Borgg 11:39, 10 April 2007

Allow Multiple Restore Sessions

The restore session is very handy for bringing up your usual web pages. It should be further enhanced by allowing a choice of several sessions that you have saved. If you don't know what I'm talking about -- its under "startup" in Firefox's preferences.

(ripped from missingparts.org) http://www.missingparts.org/request/show_full_request/14

Browser enhancement to queue links that you want to follow

Someone should write a plugin for Firefox or other browser(s) that lets you queue up links you want to follow from search results. For example, say you have results from a craigslist query and you want to follow several of them. Instead of opening each link in a new tab or window, you would be able to control click (or some other key combination) that would place the link to follow on a list. Then the browser would have a special icon to load up the next link when you are ready.

(ripped from missingparts.org) http://www.missingparts.org/request/show_full_request/13

Smart browser caching

There should be some web code technology that tells a browser which links are followed most often (based on statistics) for a certain page in order for the browser to load those pages in the background. To the vistor, they'd see a great performance increase and it'd all be behind the scenes.

For example for index.html, there are ten links: link1, link2, link3, etc. If the site gathered statistics on each of the links and found that most often vistors click link3 the most for index.html, then there might be a bit of code to let the browser know to load the page link3 refers to in the background in anticipation of the click. Something like <rating tag> link3 <end rating tag> (ripped from missingparts.org) http://www.missingparts.org/request/show_full_request/24

Updating Feature Requests

Shouldn't we keep all feature request pages updated? What i mean is, isn't it a good idea to delete requests that have been implemented since they were initially posted? That way we can keep all the pages up to date and imo, render them more useful for developers who check them etc... ChaoticMind 06:28, 28 April 2007 (PDT)

  • You could help do that. I clean up pages of its obsolete ideas sometimes because the admins/moderators do not appear to do that for us. --Armaetin 16:49, 28 April 2007 (PDT)
  • It may be helpful to strike through implemented suggestions so people won't suggest them again. --TastyWheat (talk - contribs) 01:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Great things other browsers use (Opera)

I'm drawing from my experience with other browsers such as Opera.

Firefox 3 needs a solid base on which to work on (which is being done) but it need a few more things, such as:

The ability to store/save and restore loaded pages like in Opera after re-opening the browser (last viewed pages are there - no need to download again)

Some king of speed-dial feature like in Opera (this would work great in FIrefox)

Ability to resume downloads after closing Firefox and change download links (mentioned above) - simple download properties box

Perhaps incorporation of Widgets

No need to go overboard with torrent clients and other shenanigans that just clutter the browser. Only simple, helpful and powerful features to increase browsing efficiency.

MHT READ WRITE SUPPORT IS ESSENTIAL WITHOUT IT OPERA OR INTERNET EXPLORER BECOMES CRUCIAL

Addressbar's "Paste and Go" feature like in Opera would be VERY useful

"Go to address", "Search in >" for the selected text in the right click menu, not only "Search in Google"

Unresponsive script dialog

When an unresponsive script is detected, firefox should immediately pause execution (instead of letting it run while giving you an option to stop it) to prevent a page from locking up the browser.

There's no need to keep scripts running once they're unresponsive.

How about making the Stop button work more often?

I know, it's not exactly a feature maybe, but their are _lot_ of posts on various sites about FF being 'unresponsive' under a variety of conditions

(This includes but is not limited to server not responding, while downloading large files such as podcasts, if a script becomes unresponsive, .. )

If the Stop button worked in more cases, many of these situations would be recoverable - many problems solved (or at least recovered from) with one improvment.

Blink taskbar

Firefox could blink taskbar like messenger does. There are a lot of web messengers on the web begging for this feature. The users would appreciate it. I missed a lot of messages because I didn't see there was a new message. The feature could be used by a lot of applications, not only messengers.

This feature could be implemented in javascript function.

User Profiles

Firefox will startup and ask if you want to login to a profile or continue with default, if you choose default, the normal Firefox starts but with a user name, the person will have a seperate bookmarks and history and things.

The information is encrypted and kept locally so internet speed isnt slowed down..

Report abuse button

I want to propose a new addition to Firefox. I was watching a program about child safety online. One of the things that I found interesting was that the CEO of CEOP website was praising Microsoft's Instant Messenger Service because there was a "Report Abuse" button that linked to the appropriate enforcement agencies.

Is it possible to add a similar button to the actual web browser? I know that this will require much more thought about how to engage with agencies, where to place such a button (Navgiation toolbar?), etc.

I thought I would put the idea out there to see if this is possible. Khandes3 15:47, 23 March 2008 (PDT)

Add "always on top" option for open window(s)

This would make it possible to watch Hulu in the pop-out player, and have it always visible.

GetURL for TinyURL and similar addresses

I would love to see a feature that would let users mouse over a shortened link (like one provided by TinyURL or such) and would display the full web address of the re-direct. TheUncleBob 16:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Tab Locking

The idea of tab locking is a good idea. However I don't think it should be limited to only to the domain as the original creator suggested in the Brainstorming section. My reasoning behind this has to deal with watching video. If I am watching a video that happens to be a bit long, I generally do some other browsing in other tabs. Sometimes I accidentally navigate off of my movie page.

I believe a tab locking feature that would prevent me from navigating away to any other page would be best. Or even as was originally suggested, forced an "open in new tab" for the locked page.

Also it should prevent me from being able to drag the tab into a new browser window, or at least have the option to prevent this. When I am on a page with a flash movie playing, sometimes i click on the tab and accidentally move it just slightly and it opens a browser window with that page and the flash video resets.

User-specified Java runtime

I suggest to implement a way (e.g. config parameter, command-line option, ...) to instruct FireFox not to use the Java runtime found automatically (e.g. by scanning Windows registry), but instead a different one specified by the user. For instance, when using Portable Firefox off a USB stick, it would be very useful to be able to run a Java applet via a Java runtime installed on the same removable storage.


Advanced tab loading control

I don't generally use bookmarks because I'm too busy to ever look back at them anyway. Instead, when I find a Web page that interests me, whether I've already read through it or intend to at a later date, I leave the tab open and let the session manager save it.

This works awesome and allows me to stumble upon Web sites or topics that I had forgotten about. As a computer programmer, I'm often trying to learn about multiple subjects at the same time and this allows me to keep useful material available for me to find later when I have time to work through it.

Unfortunately, this leads me to have sessions with 50 or 60 or more tabs open. It isn't a problem for most of the day, but everyday when I first start Firefox (and occasionally throughout the day as some OSes force me to restart the computer) I have to wait a LONG time for Firefox to become responsive because it's busy loading all of those tabs, many of them from very expensive sites. Additionally, the session often includes multiple tabs from YouTube or the like, which all start playing as soon as they've loaded; not only wasting resources, but forcing me to search through the mess of tabs to pause the playback.

I was pleased to find that somebody had already suggested a solution[1]. Loading the session, but refraining from actually loading every tab until requested. In practice, I probably have between 3 and 10 tabs that I use regularly, while the rest are just there for me to rediscover when I have time for them. It would be nice if those X tabs that I regularly use would load when the session is loaded, but the remainder would just load empty or placeholder tabs that are waiting for user interaction before loading. Firefox could also [optionally?] load these other tabs incrementally over time as it finds itself running idly.

This would greatly improve the user experience of Firefox for myself (and many others I've heard do this).


Disable Backspace

Firefox/Feature Brainstorming:User Interface#Disable Backspace Navigation A very good suggestion. But perhaps instead, make hotkeys modifiable.

Performance

As many guys have already said: Firefox is too slow in terms of its start-up time. This is also the main reason why other people choose a different browser (for marketing aspects ;) )
I list a few thoughts about how to shorten the start-up time (Could be alreay implemented though). In general, it is a good idea to start particular things delayed after FF has already been started (see superfetch at Windows Vista/7).

  • Do not instantiate views of the menu at start-up (I think this is partly implemented).
  • Do not build the full bookmark list. Use lazy displaying of invisible nodes of folders.
  • Do not load all plugins at start-up. Surely, some plugins really need to start at once, but some do not. Add a bool-value for plugin developers to enable/disable start-up at once.


Feel free to add other ideas!

Tab Focus Stack

This is a pretty simple feature to implement, but I think it would be very useful. Currently when a tab is closed, the tab to the right of it in the window is brought to focus by default. This is usually not a helpful behavior. If Firefox implements a stack of Tab-IDs so that whenever a tab is detached, closed, crashes, etc... it is popped off the stack and the focus returns the next tab at the top of the stack, we can save numerous keystrokes for us multitaskers.

EXAMPLE:

Right now, you have 5 tabs open in the current window. You are focused on the right-most tab of the window. But you want to pop the left-most tab into another/(or its own) window (imagine you are playing a game in one window and reading a guide in the other, or writing code and following a doc page, or sending out event invitations while looking at the address/telephone/amenities of the venue). Right now, if you simply drag the left-most tab to detach it, focus is brought to the new left-most tab of your original window, rather than the tab you most recently had focus on.

What I would like to happen is that once I detach the leftmost tab, the rightmost tab (on which I was most recently focused) would be the tab that pops back into focus.

Implementation issues: We don't want to slow down the browser by maintaining a potentially very deep list of focus. So what we can do is create a fixed-depth stack that only stores (at most) the N most recent tabs with focus. There are many acceptable ways to implement this, but the most lightweight would probably be to use an array with an index that is incremented/modulo-N. When we pop off an tab id, we can set the slot in the array corresponding to the current index to a null or -1 and then decrement our index.

Realistically, however, even a very deep stack of integers will not be a bottleneck.

Android Brainstorming

I searched through the Wiki but couldn't find a proper section about mobile (smartphone and tablet) brainstorming. As Android is the most important platform (until Firefox OS is successfully enough) and Firefox 15 Beta is much better than the previous versions, I would propose a dedicated section "Android (smartphone/tablet)" to gather ideas.

I suppose that Android users are even less technical than desktop users, so a Firefox/Feature Brainstorming wiki section should attract more ideas than bugzilla tickets.

Thailand distributes 800,000 free Android tablets to students

Ubuntu for Android

Now that the biggest online games company Valve is embracing Linux and Ubuntu is integrating webapps into the desktop, I would suggest improving Ubuntu for Android is the most important Linux project besides Firefox OS.

Please help to generalize the Unity Web API into a freedesktop standard and build a Firefox version optimized for low-cost Linux (ARM) devices (especially while Microsoft bans Firefox on ARM-based Windows).

Pakistan provides 500,000 free Ubuntu laptops to students