Add-ons/QA/Testplan/declarativeContent API

From MozillaWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Revision History

Date Version Author Description
10/23/2018 1.0 Vlad Jiman Created first draft
10/26/2018 1.0 Vlad Jiman Updated sections, added more details
10/09/2019 1.1 Alex Cornestean Updated sections

Please note, this document is still under development and parts have not been modified from the template cloning, other sections are placeholders

Overview

Purpose

This document proposes to detail the test approach to the "declarativeContent API" feature, including Entry/Exit/Acceptance criteria, Scope for testing, links to test cases etc.

Entry Criteria

  • QA has access to all the PRDs, mocks and related documents
  • The feature has landed on Nightly

Exit Criteria

  • All the bugs against the feature have been triaged
  • All the P1/P2 bugs have been fixed
  • All the resolved bugs have been verified by QA
  • The find/fixed bug ratio shows a descending trend over a defined time period

Acceptance Criteria

This section broadly outlines when the product is ready to ship

  • QA has signed off

Scope

This section describes what parts of the feature will be tested and what parts won't be.

What's in scope?

  • Validation of the entire "declarativeContent API" feature, including all related UI features.

What's out of scope?

  • Performance testing
  • Security testing

Ownership

Dev Lead: Rob Wu ; irc nick: robwu_nl
QA Manager: Krupa Raj; irc nick: krupa
QA Lead: Victor Carciu; irc nick: victorc
Webextensions QA: Alex Cornestean;

Requirements for testing

Environments

OSes covered: Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, Mobile (TBD)

Channel dependent settings (configs) and environment setups

Nightly

none

Beta

none

Release

none

Test Strategy

Test Objectives

This section details the progression test objectives that will be covered. Please note that this is at a high level. For large projects, a suite of test cases would be created which would reference directly back to this master. This could be documented in bullet form or in a table similar to the one below.

Ref Function Test Objective Test Type Owners
TO-1 Match using URL To verify that the extension will correctly display its icon when matching by URL Manual Add-ons QA Team
TO-2 Match using CSS To verify that the extension will correctly display its icon when matching by CSS Manual Add-ons QA Team
TO-3 Match using CSS + URL To verify that the extension will correctly display its icon when matching by CSS + URL Manual Add-ons QA Team
TO-4 Browser restart/crash scenarios To verify that the extension will correctly work in previous scenarios ever after restart/crash Manual Add-ons QA Team
TO-5 Sideloading, Debug To verify that the extension will correctly work after being loaded by sideload or as temporary addon Manual Add-ons QA Team

Builds

This section should contain links for builds with the feature -

  • Link for Nightly builds
  • Link for Beta builds
  • Link for Release builds

Test Execution Schedule

The following table identifies the anticipated testing period available for test execution.

Project phase Start Date End Date
Start project
Study documentation/specs received from developers 10/23/2018
QA - Test plan creation 10/23/2018
QA - Test cases/Env preparation 10/25/2018
QA - Nightly Testing
QA - Beta Testing
Release Date

Testing Tools

Detail the tools to be used for testing, for example see the following table:

Process Tool
Test plan creation Mozilla wiki
Test case creation TestRail
Test case execution TestRail
Bugs management Bugzilla

Status

Overview

Track the dates and build number where feature was released to Nightly
Track the dates and build number where feature was merged to Release/Beta

Risk analysis

Identify the high-risk assumptions
Identify existing bugs on the feature with high risk
Identify if other areas are affected by the fix

References

* List and links for specs
  PRD - chromeDev
    

* bug 1435864 - [META] Implement declarativeContent API

No results.

0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);


Testcases

Overview

The test suite proposes a series of 3 test cases devised to cover several scenarios in order to properly validate the feature.

  • Validating that an addon will properly show its icon when loading a CSS match page, but hide its icon when loading a URL or CSS+URL match page.
  • Validating that an addon will properly show its icon when loading a CSS+URL match page, but hide its icon when loading a URL or CSS match page.
  • Validating that an addon will properly show its icon when loading a URL match page, but hide its icon when loading a CSS or CSS+URL match page.

Test Areas

Test Areas Covered Details
Addon A (matching by CSS) will show its icon when matching a CSS page, but hide the icon when loading a URL or CSS+URL match page
Addon B (matching by CSS+URL) will show its icon when matching a CSS+URL page, but hide the icon when loading a CSS or URL match page
Addon C (matching by URL) will show its icon when matching a URL page, but hide the icon when loading a CSS or CSS+URL match page

Test suite

Sign off

Criteria

Check list

  • All test cases should be executed
  • Has sufficient automated test coverage (as measured by code coverage tools) - coordinate with RelMan
  • All blockers, criticals must be fixed and verified or have an agreed-upon timeline for being fixed (as determined by engineering/RelMan/QA)

Checklist

Exit Criteria Status Notes/Details
Test Plan Creation 10/23/2018 Test Plan submitted for review
Test Cases Creation 05/15/2019 Test Suite submitted for review
Critical/Blockers Fixed and Verified - Feature not landed
QA Signoff - Nightly Release - Feature does not require Nightly testing
QA Beta - Full Testing - Feature not landed
QA Signoff - Beta Release - Feature not landed