Electrolysis/Release Criteria/Scrolling
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
		
	
Scrolling responsiveness must not regress when we turn on e10s.
RASCI
- Responsible: kats
 - Accountable: RyanVM
 - Supporting: avih, jmaher, graphics team
 - Consulted: release management, jmaher
 - Informed: cpeterson, elan
 
Metrics
FX_REFRESH_DRIVER_SYNC_SCROLL_FRAME_DELAY_MS
- Regressed, see bug 1255175
 
talos tp5o_scroll
- e10s comparison validated: kats
 - Current e10s diff: worse except linux
- Linux: 17% better
 - All Windows and OS X: 45-110% worse
 
 - bug 1179735 - tp5o_scroll regression on windows compared to non-e10s
 - Note: reflects synchronous scroll only, so meaningless where APZ kicks in. Currently APZ handles only mouse wheel, so the test currently reflects autoscroll/arrows/page-up-down/etc.
 - kats comments on apz and this test
 
talos tscrollx
- e10s comparison validated: kats
 - Current e10s diff: mixed
- Linux: 30% better
 - OS X: 17% better
 - Windows 8: 7% better
 - Windows 7: 7% worse
 - Windows XP: 50% worse
 
 - bug 1249976 - tscrollx regressed 6% with e10s on December 25th
 - bug 1174772 - 2.9% win7 tscrollx regression on e10s only
 - Note: reflects synchronous scroll only, so meaningless where APZ kicks in. Currently APZ handles only mouse wheel, so the test currently reflects autoscroll/arrows/page-up-down/etc.
 - Note: tscrollx improved with e10s + no apz 6%-40% so this regression appears to be apz related.
 
Bugs
No results.
0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);