Page history
5 September 2018
11 November 2017
10 November 2017
23 August 2017
21 October 2016
28 July 2016
27 August 2015
26 August 2015
25 August 2015
edits
-33
→Why keep the .xpi packaging format?
+108
→It sounds like you've made decisions without community input
+6
no edit summary
-237
no edit summary
-19
no edit summary
+523
→Won't this limit experimentation?: reflect the actual commitment to give add-on developers freedom to innovate
+69
venn diagram link
+45
24 August 2015
Why keep the .xpi packaging format?
+314
wording
+33
Wording
+14
remove redundant stuff
-274
wording
+25
editing
-379
remove question
-180
Are malicious addons really a problem?
+128
→It sounds like you've made decisions without community input
m+47
I'm writing a new extension today. What API should I use?
+752
minor edit
m-2
Which add-ons will stop working after the deprecation?
+407
→It sounds like you've made decisions without community input
m+531
add link
+64
How will WebExtensions be cross-browser if you're extending Google's API
+877
Why WebExtensions and not Jetpack?
+794
→How will the WebExtensions API be different from the Chrome Extension API
m+77
→How will the WebExtensions API be different from the Chrome Extension API
m-1
→How will the WebExtensions API be different from the Chrome Extension API
m+258
→It sounds like you're copying Google....
m+82
→Why keep the .xpi packaging format?
m+69
→Why keep the .xpi file format?
m+5
→Why deprecate XUL now? Firefox is still using it internally.
m+40
→Why deprecate XUL now? Firefox is still using it internally.
m+303
→I already have a XUL extension. How is this not terrible news for me?
m+323
→Why does Mozilla hate power users?
m+600
add some questions
+568
→It sounds like you're copying Google....
m+301
→It sounds like you're copying Google....
m+123
Created page with "== It sounds like you're copying Google.... == We are certainly taking inspiration from Google"
+95
