canmove, Confirmed users
2,041
edits
B2G/QA/Automation/UI/Strategy/Integration vs End to end: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
B2G/QA/Automation/UI/Strategy/Integration vs End to end (view source)
Revision as of 00:59, 13 February 2015
, 13 February 2015→Two different suites of UI automation
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* Gaia Acceptance | * Gaia Acceptance | ||
** Can have longer-running tests and have reasonable amounts of fragility due to non-determinism | ** Can have longer-running tests and have reasonable amounts of fragility due to non-determinism | ||
** Results can be occasionally ambiguous as a trade off for higher coverage | ** Results can be occasionally ambiguous as a trade-off for higher coverage | ||
** Has much less restriction than Integration, so long as time spent triaging failures isn't extreme | ** Has much less restriction than Integration, so long as time spent triaging failures isn't extreme | ||
** Runs after each Tinderbox or candidate build to quickly find full-stack bugs | ** Runs after each Tinderbox or candidate build to quickly find full-stack bugs | ||