Firefox/AddOns/Status/20150911: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Firefox/AddOns/Status/20150911 (view source)

Revision as of 18:03, 21 September 2015

74 bytes removed , 21 September 2015

→‎Risks/Issues: removed erroneous reference fixed bolding

Lshapiro

Confirmed users

613

edits

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ! Initiative !! Risks/Issues !! Owner !! Mitigation/Approach
 |-
-! Addon Signing !! Unlisted add-ons considered critical are being reviewed as soon as they are submitted (unlisted queue is under control) but many unlisted add-on developers have not (or are presumed to have not) yet submitted for review.  We are at 43% of "need to have" add-ons signed as per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xLnFtXLcIfIXFZodj1sFYzyDdFJ1vR3CKYNb_n-g30c/edit#gid=1874511985 but only 5% of "nice to have". || Lisa Brewster/Add-ons Review Team ||reaching out to unlisted add-on devs to ensure they submit for review, focusing resources on unlisted add-on reviews, longer term we are changing how we review.
+Addon Signing Unlisted add-ons considered critical are being reviewed as soon as they are submitted (unlisted queue is under control) but many unlisted add-on developers have not (or are presumed to have not) yet submitted for review.  We are at 43% of "need to have" add-ons signed as per https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xLnFtXLcIfIXFZodj1sFYzyDdFJ1vR3CKYNb_n-g30c/edit#gid=1874511985 but only 5% of "nice to have". || Lisa Brewster/Add-ons Review Team ||reaching out to unlisted add-on devs to ensure they submit for review, focusing resources on unlisted add-on reviews, longer term we are changing how we review.
 |-
-! AMO !! Review Queue - we have insufficient resources for the listed review queue which is very long and growing. We recently hired one new FTE, but also moved one reviewer over to wengineering development. We do have budget for two contract reviewers, but hiring has been a challenge. Review queue challenges illustrated here: http://diox.github.io/amo-review-times/ and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E41MCpqf71Ayx1Im4dCspu7bxNzaMpOSYiVDQXL8dK4
+AMO Review Queue - we have insufficient resources for the listed review queue which is very long and growing. We recently hired one new FTE, but also moved one reviewer over to wengineering development. We do have budget for two contract reviewers, but hiring has been a challenge. Review queue challenges illustrated here: http://diox.github.io/amo-review-times/ and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E41MCpqf71Ayx1Im4dCspu7bxNzaMpOSYiVDQXL8dK4
   || Lisa/Addon Review team || Additional contract reviewers being hired now for short term mitigation, but contracts are taking longer than hoped. Also longer term changes to how we review are planned, SLA being established, etc.
 |-
-! AMO !! Validator - the validator has several issues slowing down the queue - it is not providing very useful results to developers, and it is rejecting 4/5 addons.   || Validator team, Kev, Larissa || We have plans in development, 2 Engineers assigned to improvements, and the first phase of these is nearly complete. We may, given the AWS situation, seek additional resources.
+AMO Validator - the validator has several issues slowing down the queue - it is not providing very useful results to developers, and it is rejecting 4/5 addons.   || Validator team, Kev, Larissa || We have plans in development, 2 Engineers assigned to improvements, and the first phase of these is nearly complete.
 |-
 |}