MDN/Get involved/Becoming editor: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
The current discussion suggest we have two possible strategies to onboard new editors:
The current discussion suggest we have two possible strategies to onboard new editors:


* A "gatekeeper" strategy: It requires new editors to be vouch be someone (another editor, an admin, etc.) and grant them with a large set of right
* A "gatekeeper" strategy: It requires new editors to be vouched by someone (another editor, an admin, etc.) who grants them a large set of rights.
* A "progressive enhancement" strategy: It gives new editors a limited set of right and progressively enhance their privileges based on their behaviors
* A "progressive enhancement" strategy: It gives new editors a limited set of rights and progressively enhances their privileges based on their behaviors.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 15: Line 15:
| <!-- Gatekeeper -->
| <!-- Gatekeeper -->
'''PRO'''
'''PRO'''
* Prevent Spam very efficiently
* Prevents Spam very efficiently
'''CON'''
'''CON'''
* Requires a manual validation at the lowest level of onboarding which make the process flood sensitive.
* Requires a manual validation at the lowest level of onboarding which make the process flood sensitive.
Line 21: Line 21:
| <!-- Progressive enhancement -->
| <!-- Progressive enhancement -->
'''PRO'''
'''PRO'''
* Allow simple casual editing
* Allows simple casual editing
* Does not require a manual attention at the lowest level of rights.
* Does not require a manual attention at the lowest level of rights.
'''CON'''
'''CON'''
* Limit Spam but cannot prevent it a 100%
* Limits Spam but cannot prevent it 100%
|}
|}


canmove, Confirmed users
1,953

edits

Navigation menu