Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
MOSS/Mission Partners: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Formatting
(Update pre-launch of Track 2) |
(Formatting) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* The project should be to write or enhance some software or software documentation which is under an OSI open source and/or an FSF free software license (non-software exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis). | * The project should be to write or enhance some software or software documentation which is under an OSI open source and/or an FSF free software license (non-software exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis). | ||
* The project should benefit Mozilla’s mission. This is normally demonstrated by tying the objective of the project to specific Mozilla manifesto principles or other demonstrated priorities. | * The project should benefit Mozilla’s mission. This is normally demonstrated by tying the objective of the project to specific Mozilla manifesto principles or other demonstrated priorities. | ||
* Activities which are not sufficient for an award on their own include: | * Activities which are not sufficient for an award on their own include: | ||
** Writing open source software (notwithstanding manifesto principle #7) | ** Writing open source software (notwithstanding manifesto principle #7) | ||
** Building something cool with web technologies | ** Building something cool with web technologies | ||
** Translating open source software into another language | ** Translating open source software into another language | ||
* The project’s home can be anywhere in the world where we can make payment without undue burden. We have a reasonably strong preference for funding legal organizations rather than individuals representing projects, although exceptional circumstances could lead to some flexibility. | * The project’s home can be anywhere in the world where we can make payment without undue burden. We have a reasonably strong preference for funding legal organizations rather than individuals representing projects, although exceptional circumstances could lead to some flexibility. | ||
* The specific project activity should be endorsed (on the application form) by someone well-known and respected in a wider software community of which the project is a part. | * The specific project activity should be endorsed (on the application form) by someone well-known and respected in a wider software community of which the project is a part. | ||