Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Reviewing

43 bytes added, 20:36, 5 September 2016
Minor tweaks
Add-ons must not be rejected because a reviewer doesn't find them useful. We let AMO users make that call, and add-ons that aren't very useful won't gain much usage and have low search rankings, so they'll stay mostly out of the way.
However, if it looks like an add-on shouldn't be '''listed''' on AMO, because it's intended for an internal company deployment, for testing purposes, or only private use, it should be rejected with the suggestion to go unlisted instead, and a link to the [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Distribution Distribution page].
Add-ons that are potentially dangerous and have a limited audience (like SSL certificate installers) should be Rejected, while noting to the developer that they can submit the add-on as [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Distribution Unlisted].
Canmove, confirm
1,448
edits

Navigation menu