Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Moderation: Difference between revisions

Updated as per feedback from 24th July
(Added the advice on flagging add-on for review when review suggests the add-on might be malicious)
(Updated as per feedback from 24th July)
 
Line 24: Line 24:
*Delete spam reviews.
*Delete spam reviews.
*Delete any support, feature request or bug reports if that's the only content in the review.
*Delete any support, feature request or bug reports if that's the only content in the review.
**Keep reviews that describe functionality of the add-on without making explicit ask for new features or bug fixes.
**Don’t try to verify any issues described in the rating.
*Delete reviews that only point to "better" add-ons or new compatible versions in external sites.
*Delete reviews that only point to "better" add-ons or new compatible versions in external sites.
*Delete reviews that don't provide a useful review of the add-on:
*Delete reviews that don't provide a useful review of the add-on:
**If the only content is something like "Good", "Bad", "This sucks".
**Delete review if the content is just "Good", "Bad", "This sucks".
*Delete reviews that contain content unrelated to the add-on being reviewed.
*Flag add-on for review if the rating review suggests that the add-on could be malicious.
*Flag add-on for review if the rating review suggests that the add-on could be malicious.
*Keep all other reviews
*Keep all other reviews


[[Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Review_Decision|Previous: Review Decisions]] [[Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Team|Next: The Review Team]]
[[Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Review_Decision|Previous: Review Decisions]] [[Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Team|Next: The Review Team]]
17

edits