18
edits
(clarify that safe nullptr crashes are often not security issues at all) |
|||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
* Identification of users by profiling browsing behavior. | * Identification of users by profiling browsing behavior. | ||
* Corruption of chrome dialogs or user input without the ability to spoof arbitrary messages | * Corruption of chrome dialogs or user input without the ability to spoof arbitrary messages | ||
* Most Denial of Service vulnerabilities, such as triggering a release assertion or those requiring a browser restart | * Most Denial of Service vulnerabilities, such as triggering a release assertion or those requiring a browser restart, when triggerable from the web. In contrast, safe crashes of a content process, like a nullptr deref, are not considered security issues. Neither are safe crashes in the parent which would require a compromised content process. | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} | ||
edits