439
edits
Talk:NSS Library Init: Difference between revisions
→Read-Only applications prevent read-write DB access?
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The statement seems to suggest that separate applications affect each others' ability to open databases for read/write access. Surely that is not true with cert9 DBs, is it?? | The statement seems to suggest that separate applications affect each others' ability to open databases for read/write access. Surely that is not true with cert9 DBs, is it?? | ||
I think the section meant to say that, in a single application, if the first caller of NSS_Init opens it read-only, then the second caller cannot have read-write access. But that's not what it seems to say. | I think the section meant to say that, in a single application, if the first caller of NSS_Init opens it read-only, then the second caller cannot have read-write access. But that's not what it seems to say. | ||
> Bad wording it should say 'some NSS users'. The issue is NSS users operating in the same address space. | |||
== Binary compatibility means applications must continue to fail? == | == Binary compatibility means applications must continue to fail? == | ||